From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757195Ab3BGA4g (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:56:36 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:55913 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386Ab3BGA4d (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:56:33 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.4-dev To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: next-20130206 cpufreq - WARN in sysfs_add_one In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:24:39 +0100." <17233164.aBDzy1OViI@vostro.rjw.lan> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <9180.1360172675@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <17233164.aBDzy1OViI@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1360198558_2167P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:55:58 -0500 Message-ID: <30908.1360198558@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=dagger.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020207.5112FBA0.0045,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1360198558_2167P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:24:39 +0100, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said: > On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:44:35 PM Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > > Seen in dmesg. next-20130128 was OK. Haven't done a bisect, but can > > do so if the offender isn't obvious... > > I suppose this is 73bf0fc "cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy->cpu". > > Can you test the linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq branch alone, please, and see > if that's this one (top-most commit)? Color me mystified. I can't find that commit by either number or the description: [/usr/src/linux-next] git log | egrep -i 'cpufreq.*remove.*link' [/usr/src/linux-next] git log | grep -i 73bf0fc [/usr/src/linux-next] Was that a very recent commit that may have gotten pushed too late for the next-20130206 merge? --==_Exmh_1360198558_2167P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBURL7ngdmEQWDXROgAQITTg/9EvAJblZcE9YXSZ03+bP2NmEGIR+xFICF RC3l0oe6ss70WxjrxjltP1LGnoi22cJD5dUPZC66W9RQu7AlA4J5A6Oi2Jcicper b9HItqrwItHUjAXnnXg45qKnG4WcrMEbSM7cG1ieOuGnBUdBq6ZKxlFnvEOc8ZtD 1IASH/zavTMHHeY1lWShVj8wQ2yWUvGUcKTwz9pD7/D7LVpo5Zo29gp1bBKWmy0R CrYGcYpdbkkx+5i94VXLJNMY0njaZgGdbRFvBoRR3vOrmgehyaGSMtMoTCgYb18m ymTzS/I/x4S/WsZ5tlbdfKgzwSds8JQh5xH2uCb6Ib2YXPAuzNA04TwxT4ta/M+B 7smFJndcKmPB2CklVT2AoqH7kpfHiFb6xqe8RkmaWQ5LXRTPHZh+jpfcKHDBmj0j g6Sy4PR+WeAgpBh/+IR/0iT2Jip2fmw8HOcTfCQF/uPuNEN2q4fVZDFRA0tBrt6e sAdW1gCoiJnLln3dK271iJNr/a8WLmW/EuW2B/WvvHKhmfoBqBb29/cIL6LpGp3F O7p6mQFv5RsWGOmfVHcUj2OjKFyFFIdwf1hNbivtoYbQvwUyhMl4P3lk1OPQVbqP jpJnDnEShdoAvGC45S2Q9KFrx9Tzv02moiMkbuhlNzEHjXFtlJ7Vg4nFtObtbZYu VuXhKi5SLtw= =6gKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1360198558_2167P--