From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7FF1DACAA for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736804285; cv=none; b=rvCCOiJEnUuAZY8/RtmfxyyoHNZFbTBzI7HRX7jvUVkDRVUMk+oyJ/dDxhEqjfjVPz3KZuBp8yAqU4MSs2y99DJdbZH9Cb7+7IBDbwX0xzmkVi28HsSPQdLw6tvmfjVYZRNvGvOotUZ9mZyvZ4UVtJXiFH/tMquZ2bgzN6sEv3w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736804285; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ePLveDncFA1QceFyajNbMHSnrnDlVu90kYwV5VWjDXw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=TrY7ZqP12gQLweaykRQ9NK0X5nGT2QIUHOX0c/eRbhxdNBMtiNDy6hnXZgd33RlP/oz5hJilz2mU6CcGh2tdZJw3eegVBkN3Kjq8yC1RLEv+46Fif55hmSLBKZzi92N8uXfVWAYr/djqkn5Ytdh6QFPSjzWWWRRzHLpcAv1GOhM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ljpPiuvZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ljpPiuvZ" Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ab2c9b8aecaso653016966b.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:38:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1736804282; x=1737409082; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rIr/EX3/hI6u58j1cw15fQTC3hhjJsctEXKNiZBULH4=; b=ljpPiuvZulvbmtwnZuWID6wtiJvge7PaxOY2ODfGYnip09nF067/rC///jFjsdOz4z 5XVQW8gF5DECRbewN0nkVbsJrAOCP1Edz+n5GtIb4nXkXfBqMu3ppO4PaioieO8aeL1H 31zhTq3D3ZbSkAlxcSg2kj0mL623w7OUedH8WxyA54qCuOS+ZDsSAoNaMqWgmP+zJagT utiEkROTdrvBH3ZS/NXJqgp8mE+deshfGiAsn7F/xm5L8c1ZGcTzFSAXALnKAoCEP1YP MeNOO9moWtDbQTcMBjID5CHcmbbkrOTSfZ7XV9XT83ksReyw3oJG8uxh37GZ8Dwmke1y niXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736804282; x=1737409082; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rIr/EX3/hI6u58j1cw15fQTC3hhjJsctEXKNiZBULH4=; b=WZ4pSlZl6Hh8ZDba7k2DB2OoH9Ebxx//xzyAFBH1zvFVm2fK8fq+6Lyfw1ON+qjWjv MhNupsW56hIQD0zyGyBf50aa/NAoTJEgxkZnY4hJN1E6f/llGtCX0rcv9HhLWDpxclfs tpQC7xgh9967nLuODrXy0P/7mBypUjahOrkqmks+ejuS/KNYJvUlW9encKGfkxzvk+vw UdxCBUqNBemU2AaRmvUZI2ykRI4vxrgusGrg6CmhHKiUPkcSMLQcrtpoRSw47u5r/U3i vAQ+fl4BYMc89gJf5NY3g6jCJ/ylx0wLODr7krbkvLas6q2hSTFjuXYiHf+sVj0aTuEx ucvA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPgyOitjNj9mtmVIIljU3diBgdt8h+iyOYBwgq/9Eb5G6UH24snlRU4vLdlNDKNhxT2F2JuugxSIHhFuQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyH4MOqVxW/4HpPs1wknWxctQU5GHjiis7PjOsUdGJli6iwhpfT gYACxx2e6kBr/kcH3gDtWHugq4vvVTToG3rT7M+FgFBNq5nE8Iue X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs/XmB+JceXl1LfifjC7QhvnYU4z1shsT3FZ8IJW8W99VZMrb9bjfnaumBon00 F6zvD9mZg2sOb8x6rC0Czan9Ve4eKiT00I8Hf7BuOK13Hpwojrb9D/gLVX8B46SZ6GI1tnOPuLd BdHaHczsm8KYMgk2T34D2MzW5CIrx4aSQqL2OosrXn/Urla0n8zB3SSXQvNBYXpJfiJNDotfGVx SxgHel2CRq2jgdtqoFpi9blHtxTRT0yvjy/dI8CcFxZYWeUIXzJpEpxCACdCiUaYjpyYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtumf6KZWBG7fEiqjaY9M5AhLT40xlsS9Y4Rizcwa+OIRQuS030NjAtIg5v4qc5rFGXMVmAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7950:b0:aa6:7933:8b2f with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ab2ab16a302mr1798158866b.9.1736804281754; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:38:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([95.43.220.235]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-ab321168be8sm140707366b.121.2025.01.13.13.38.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:38:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <30a066e0-08d8-4ad3-a0ba-e44f4379427e@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 23:38:00 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] soc: audio-graph-card2: use correct endpoint when getting link parameters To: Mark Brown Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, tony@atomide.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Merlijn Wajer References: <20241220071126.1066691-1-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> <9cc6c2ad-0811-482d-91c8-d162bd7f09f4@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Ivaylo Dimitrov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 13.01.25 г. 19:01 ч., Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 06:24:18PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > >> I understand people are busy, but I also see community sent patches being >> treated with low priority, or being silently ignored too often lately, but >> lets not go into that. > >> I sent that RFC patch on 20.12.2024, today is 13.10.2025 - if this is not a >> reasonable time, well, what is? By the same time I sent 2 other patches and >> they are already in -next. In the meanwhile I see patches sent in the >> morning to be reviewed till the end of the day - not critical bugfixes >> patches but new functionality. > > Well, you've used a subject line for a different subsystem so there's a > good chance that I simply didn't look at the mail beyond that (many of > us get a lot of random CCs). You also don't seem to have CCed the ALSA > list, nor for that matter Morimoto-san who maintains the generic card so > perhaps I was just waiting for his review. I honestly can't remember. > I'll also note that there's only been a week of work time for me so far > this year, and you sent this on the last day I worked last year. > Honestly, I was surprised Morimoto-san was missing, but see: ivo@ivo-H81M-S2PV:/mnt/VM/home/user/linux/droid4-linux$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-soc-audio-graph-card2-use-correct-endpoint-when-gett.patch Liam Girdwood (supporter:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...) Mark Brown (supporter:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...) Jaroslav Kysela (maintainer:SOUND) Takashi Iwai (maintainer:SOUND) Ivaylo Dimitrov (commit_signer:1/1=100%,authored:1/1=100%,added_lines:28/28=100%,removed_lines:31/31=100%) alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) this is on 6.6.y, against which the RFC patch is. Perhaps I should have called get_maintainer.pl in -next tree, my bad, will note for the future. >> Also, I don't understand how the ping was content free, given that it was on >> top of the original patch, unless I don't get what "content free" is >> supposed to mean, possible, I am not native English speaker. > > Your mail added the single word "ping". That is not saying anything > meaningful so adds nothing, and as the form letter I sent indicated > results in a mail that's not directly actionable. As it says: > > | all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > | directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > | anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > | some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > | for the subsystem are normally handled. > > Blub for the subject letter thing: > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. > Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and > make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing. > There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone. oh, yeah, sorry, that should have been ASoC:, not soc: Ok, I think both of us wasted lots of cycles in vain, please, just confirm if I shall do anything else but wait. Thanks and regards, Ivo