From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:59:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30f32467-51ea-47de-a272-38e074f4060b@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129172200.430674-3-sjg@chromium.org>
Hi,
a few more comments after decompiling the FIT image:
On 29.11.23 18:21, Simon Glass wrote:
> + with fsw.add_node('kernel'):
> + fsw.property_string('description', args.name)
> + fsw.property_string('type', 'kernel_noload')
The specification only says no loading done, but doesn't explain what it
means for a bootloader to _not_ load an image. Looking into the U-Boot commit
b9b50e89d317 ("image: Implement IH_TYPE_KERNEL_NOLOAD") that introduces this,
apparently no loading means ignoring load and entry address?
I presume missing load and entry is something older U-Boot versions
were unhappy about? Please let me know if the semantics are as I understood,
so I can prepare a barebox patch supporting it.
> + fsw.property_string('arch', args.arch)
> + fsw.property_string('os', args.os)
> + fsw.property_string('compression', args.compress)
> + fsw.property('data', data)
> + fsw.property_u32('load', 0)
> + fsw.property_u32('entry', 0)
> +
> +
> +def finish_fit(fsw, entries):
> + """Finish the FIT ready for use
> +
> + Writes the /configurations node and subnodes
> +
> + Args:
> + fsw (libfdt.FdtSw): Object to use for writing
> + entries (list of tuple): List of configurations:
> + str: Description of model
> + str: Compatible stringlist
> + """
> + fsw.end_node()
> + seq = 0
> + with fsw.add_node('configurations'):
> + for model, compat in entries:
> + seq += 1
> + with fsw.add_node(f'conf-{seq}'):
> + fsw.property('compatible', bytes(compat))
The specification says that this is the root U-Boot compatible,
which I presume to mean the top-level compatible, which makes sense to me.
The code here though adds all compatible strings from the device tree though,
is this intended?
> + fsw.property_string('description', model)
> + fsw.property_string('type', 'flat_dt')
> + fsw.property_string('arch', arch)
> + fsw.property_string('compression', compress)
> + fsw.property('compatible', bytes(compat))
I think I've never seen a compatible for a fdt node before.
What use does this serve?
Cheers,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 17:21 [PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: Add a build target for " Simon Glass
2023-11-29 17:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] arm64: Add BOOT_TARGETS variable Simon Glass
2023-11-29 17:21 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree Simon Glass
2023-11-29 18:35 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-29 19:00 ` Simon Glass
2023-11-29 20:35 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-30 20:30 ` Simon Glass
2023-11-29 18:59 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-11-29 19:02 ` Tom Rini
2023-11-29 19:16 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-29 20:10 ` Tom Rini
2023-11-29 19:02 ` Simon Glass
2023-11-29 19:14 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-29 19:27 ` Simon Glass
2023-11-29 19:33 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-29 19:44 ` Simon Glass
2023-11-29 19:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-11-30 20:30 ` Simon Glass
2023-12-01 2:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-12-02 16:36 ` Simon Glass
2023-12-04 17:52 ` Doug Anderson
2023-12-05 11:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-12-05 17:06 ` Doug Anderson
2023-11-30 8:20 ` Nicolas Schier
2023-11-30 15:12 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-11-30 15:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-11-30 20:32 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30f32467-51ea-47de-a272-38e074f4060b@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=terrelln@fb.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®