From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Linus Benedict Torvalds Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Summary: small poll for my new operating system Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1991 20:57:08 UTC Organization: University of Helsinki Originally-to: X-Dedication: No, it wasn't on this list ('cause it did not yet exist.) But it deserves a small encore, For this is truly Linux lore. To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Reply-to: Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-ID: <30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello everybody out there using minix - I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things). I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-) Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi) PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.