From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, joro@8bytes.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
vincent.stehle@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 18/23] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3119943e-30f1-823d-c6a2-157b26901a41@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46f39a8e-a909-5493-b1eb-f8f082b0bb20@redhat.com>
On 13/05/2019 08:46, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On 5/8/19 7:20 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 08/04/2019 13:19, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> When a stage 1 related fault event is read from the event queue,
>>> let's propagate it to potential external fault listeners, ie. users
>>> who registered a fault handler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> - s/IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_INST/IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> index 8044445bc32a..1fd320788dcb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> @@ -167,6 +167,26 @@
>>> #define ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG1 0xd8
>>> #define ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG2 0xdc
>>> +/* Events */
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_UUT 0x01
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STREAMID 0x02
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STE_FETCH 0x03
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STE 0x04
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_BAD_ATS_TREQ 0x05
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STREAM_DISABLED 0x06
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSL_FORBIDDEN 0x07
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID 0x08
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CD_FETCH 0x09
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_CD 0x0a
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_WALK_EABT 0x0b
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSLATION 0x10
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ADDR_SIZE 0x11
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ACCESS 0x12
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_PERMISSION 0x13
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TLB_CONFLICT 0x20
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CFG_CONFLICT 0x21
>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_E_PAGE_REQUEST 0x24
>>> +
>>> /* Common MSI config fields */
>>> #define MSI_CFG0_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 2)
>>> #define MSI_CFG2_SH GENMASK(5, 4)
>>> @@ -332,6 +352,15 @@
>>> #define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 7
>>> #define EVTQ_0_ID GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
>>> +#define EVTQ_0_SSV GENMASK_ULL(11, 11)
>>> +#define EVTQ_0_SUBSTREAMID GENMASK_ULL(31, 12)
>>> +#define EVTQ_0_STREAMID GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)
>>> +#define EVTQ_1_PNU GENMASK_ULL(33, 33)
>>> +#define EVTQ_1_IND GENMASK_ULL(34, 34)
>>> +#define EVTQ_1_RNW GENMASK_ULL(35, 35)
>>> +#define EVTQ_1_S2 GENMASK_ULL(39, 39)
>>> +#define EVTQ_1_CLASS GENMASK_ULL(40, 41)
>>> +#define EVTQ_3_FETCH_ADDR GENMASK_ULL(51, 3)
>>> /* PRI queue */
>>> #define PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS 2
>>> @@ -639,6 +668,64 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
>>> spinlock_t devices_lock;
>>> };
>>> +/* fault propagation */
>>> +
>>> +#define IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS (IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID | \
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PERM_VALID | \
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_ADDR_VALID)
>>> +
>>> +struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data {
>>> + enum iommu_fault_reason reason;
>>> + bool s1_check;
>>> + u32 fields; /* IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_*_VALID bits */
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Describes how SMMU faults translate into generic IOMMU faults
>>> + * and if they need to be reported externally
>>> + */
>>> +static const struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data
>>> fault_propagation[] = {
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_UUT] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STREAMID] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STE_FETCH] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STE] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_BAD_ATS_TREQ] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STREAM_DISABLED] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSL_FORBIDDEN] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PASID_INVALID,
>>> + false,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CD_FETCH] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PASID_FETCH,
>>> + false,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID |
>>
>> It doesn't make sense to presume validity here, or in any of the faults
>> below...
>
>
>>
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_CD] =
>>> {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_BAD_PASID_ENTRY,
>>> + false,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_WALK_EABT] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_WALK_EABT, true,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS |
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSLATION] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PTE_FETCH,
>>> true,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ADDR_SIZE] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_OOR_ADDRESS,
>>> true,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ACCESS] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_ACCESS, true,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_PERMISSION] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PERMISSION,
>>> true,
>>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>>> + },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TLB_CONFLICT] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CFG_CONFLICT] = { },
>>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_E_PAGE_REQUEST] = { },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
>>> u32 opt;
>>> const char *prop;
>>> @@ -1258,7 +1345,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct
>>> arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> -__maybe_unused
>>> static struct arm_smmu_master_data *
>>> arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1284,24 +1370,85 @@ arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device
>>> *smmu, u32 sid)
>>> return master;
>>> }
>>> +/* Populates the record fields according to the input SMMU event */
>>> +static bool arm_smmu_transcode_fault(u64 *evt, u8 type,
>>> + struct iommu_fault_unrecoverable *record)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data *data;
>>> + u32 fields;
>>> +
>>> + if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(fault_propagation))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + data = &fault_propagation[type];
>>> + if (!data->reason)
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + fields = data->fields;
>>> +
>>> + if (data->s1_check & FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_S2, evt[1]))
>>> + return false; /* S2 related fault, don't propagate */
>>> +
>>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID) {
>>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SSV, evt[0]))
>>> + record->pasid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SUBSTREAMID, evt[0]);
>>> + else
>>> + fields &= ~IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID;
>>
>> ...because this logic then breaks for C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID, which ends up
>> coming out of here *without* reporting the offending PASID.
> Correct.
>>
>>> + }
>>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PERM_VALID) {
>>> + if (!FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_RNW, evt[1]))
>>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE;
>>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_PNU, evt[1]))
>>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV;
>>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_IND, evt[1]))
>>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC;
>>> + }
>>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_ADDR_VALID)
>>> + record->addr = evt[2];
>>> +
>>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID)
>>> + record->fetch_addr = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_3_FETCH_ADDR, evt[3]);
>>> +
>>> + record->flags = fields;
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void arm_smmu_report_event(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64
>>> *evt)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 sid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_STREAMID, evt[0]);
>>> + u8 type = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_ID, evt[0]);
>>> + struct arm_smmu_master_data *master;
>>> + struct iommu_fault_event event = {};
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + master = arm_smmu_find_master(smmu, sid);
>>> + if (WARN_ON(!master))
>>> + return;
>>
>> NAK. If I'm getting global faults like C_BAD_STE where a device almost
>> certainly *isn't* configured (because hey, we would have initialised its
>> STEs if we knew), then I sure as hell want to see the actual faults.
>> Spamming a constant stream of stack traces *instead* of showing them is
>> worse than useless.
> Sure, if !master I will output the original traces.
>>
>>> +
>>> + event.fault.type = IOMMU_FAULT_DMA_UNRECOV;
>>> +
>>> + if (arm_smmu_transcode_fault(evt, type, &event.fault.event)) {
>>> + iommu_report_device_fault(master->dev, &event);
>>> + return;
>>
>> And again, the vast majority of the time, there won't be a fault handler
>> registered, so unconditionally suppressing the most common and useful
>> stuff like translation and permission faults is very much not OK.
> Going to test whether we are in nested mode before entering that path.
I don't think this has to be exclusive to nesting - the generic
reporting mechanism feels like it might ultimately be extensible to
other things like Rob's case for generalised stalling. It's just that
for robustness, even when a fault handler is present, we still want the
driver to be able to report if it didn't actually handle a fault.
Thanks,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 12:18 [PATCH v7 00/23] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] driver core: add per device iommu param Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] iommu: introduce device fault data Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] iommu: introduce device fault report API Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger
2019-05-15 12:09 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-05-15 13:06 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-15 15:57 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 05/23] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Eric Auger
2019-05-01 10:38 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-05-02 6:58 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-02 10:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-05-02 16:46 ` Jacob Pan
2019-05-07 11:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-05-08 13:59 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-10 14:35 ` Auger Eric
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_ATTACH/DETACH_PASID_TABLE Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_BIND/UNBIND_MSI Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 10/23] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Link domains and devices Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger
2019-05-08 14:05 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-08 18:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger
2019-05-08 14:24 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-10 14:34 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-13 11:43 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-13 14:40 ` Auger Eric
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger
2019-05-08 14:38 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-10 14:35 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-13 12:04 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger
2019-05-08 15:01 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-13 12:16 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-13 14:01 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-13 14:04 ` Auger Eric
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger
2019-05-08 16:42 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
2019-05-08 17:20 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-13 7:46 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-13 11:54 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-05-13 12:32 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-13 13:47 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] vfio-pci: Add a new VFIO_REGION_TYPE_NESTED region type Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] vfio-pci: Register an iommu fault handler Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] vfio_pci: Allow to mmap the fault queue Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] vfio-pci: Add VFIO_PCI_DMA_FAULT_IRQ_INDEX Eric Auger
2019-04-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] vfio: Document nested stage control Eric Auger
2019-04-30 7:09 ` [PATCH v7 00/23] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3119943e-30f1-823d-c6a2-157b26901a41@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.stehle@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®