mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Al Grant <al.grant@arm.com>,
	Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: determine if LR is the return address
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:39:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3184a838-9784-eb86-09ad-ceadabcd3381@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122161854.5289-4-alexandre.truong@arm.com>



On 22/01/2021 18:18, Alexandre Truong wrote:

> +}
> +
> +static int add_entry(struct unwind_entry *entry, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct entries *entries = arg;
> +
> +	entries->stack[entries->i++] = entry->ip;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread)
> +{
> +	u64 leaf_frame;
> +	struct entries entries = {{0, 0}, 0};
> +
> +	if (get_leaf_frame_caller_enabled(sample))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	unwind__get_entries(add_entry, &entries, thread, sample, 2);
> +	leaf_frame = callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLER ?
> +		entries.stack[0] : entries.stack[1];
> +
> +	if (leaf_frame + 1 == sample->user_regs.regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR])
> +		return sample->user_regs.regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR];

Hi Alex,

From your other reply about your investigation it looks like the check against PERF_REG_ARM64_LR isn't
required because libunwind won't return a value if it's not correct. Whether it's equal to the LR or not.

And PERF_REG_ARM64_LR points to the instruction _after_ the call site. i.e. where to return to,
not where the call was made from. So just leaf_frame rather than leaf_frame+1 would be more accurate.

I was also looking at unwind_entry in machine.c which is similar to your add_entry function and saw that it
does some extra bits like this:

	if (symbol_conf.hide_unresolved && entry->ms.sym == NULL)
		return 0;

	if (append_inlines(cursor, &entry->ms, entry->ip) == 0)
		return 0;

	/*
	 * Convert entry->ip from a virtual address to an offset in
	 * its corresponding binary.
	 */
	if (entry->ms.map)
		addr = map__map_ip(entry->ms.map, entry->ip);

I have a feeling you will also need to do those on your values returned from libunwind to make it 100%
equivalent.

James

> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..16dc03fa9abe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> +#define __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> +
> +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread);
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 40082d70eec1..bc6147e46c89 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include "bpf-event.h"
>  #include <internal/lib.h> // page_size
>  #include "cgroup.h"
> +#include "arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h"
>  
>  #include <linux/ctype.h>
>  #include <symbol/kallsyms.h>
> @@ -2671,10 +2672,12 @@ static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread,
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
> -		struct thread *thread __maybe_unused)
> +static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	if (strncmp(thread->maps->machine->env->arch, "aarch64", 7) == 0)
> +		return get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(sample, thread);
> +	else
> +		return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 16:18 [PATCH 1/4] perf tools: record aarch64 registers automatically Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: add a mechanism to inject stack frames Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: enable dwarf_callchain_users on arm64 Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: determine if LR is the return address Alexandre Truong
2021-01-24  0:05   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-01-25  9:39     ` James Clark
2021-02-08 15:39   ` James Clark [this message]
2021-02-10 12:05     ` Alexandre Truong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3184a838-9784-eb86-09ad-ceadabcd3381@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=al.grant@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.truong@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shikemeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=wilco.dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®