From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@arm.com>,
Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: determine if LR is the return address
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:39:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3184a838-9784-eb86-09ad-ceadabcd3381@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122161854.5289-4-alexandre.truong@arm.com>
On 22/01/2021 18:18, Alexandre Truong wrote:
> +}
> +
> +static int add_entry(struct unwind_entry *entry, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct entries *entries = arg;
> +
> + entries->stack[entries->i++] = entry->ip;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread)
> +{
> + u64 leaf_frame;
> + struct entries entries = {{0, 0}, 0};
> +
> + if (get_leaf_frame_caller_enabled(sample))
> + return 0;
> +
> + unwind__get_entries(add_entry, &entries, thread, sample, 2);
> + leaf_frame = callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLER ?
> + entries.stack[0] : entries.stack[1];
> +
> + if (leaf_frame + 1 == sample->user_regs.regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR])
> + return sample->user_regs.regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR];
Hi Alex,
From your other reply about your investigation it looks like the check against PERF_REG_ARM64_LR isn't
required because libunwind won't return a value if it's not correct. Whether it's equal to the LR or not.
And PERF_REG_ARM64_LR points to the instruction _after_ the call site. i.e. where to return to,
not where the call was made from. So just leaf_frame rather than leaf_frame+1 would be more accurate.
I was also looking at unwind_entry in machine.c which is similar to your add_entry function and saw that it
does some extra bits like this:
if (symbol_conf.hide_unresolved && entry->ms.sym == NULL)
return 0;
if (append_inlines(cursor, &entry->ms, entry->ip) == 0)
return 0;
/*
* Convert entry->ip from a virtual address to an offset in
* its corresponding binary.
*/
if (entry->ms.map)
addr = map__map_ip(entry->ms.map, entry->ip);
I have a feeling you will also need to do those on your values returned from libunwind to make it 100%
equivalent.
James
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..16dc03fa9abe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> +#define __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> +
> +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread);
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 40082d70eec1..bc6147e46c89 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include "bpf-event.h"
> #include <internal/lib.h> // page_size
> #include "cgroup.h"
> +#include "arm-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h"
>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <symbol/kallsyms.h>
> @@ -2671,10 +2672,12 @@ static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
> - struct thread *thread __maybe_unused)
> +static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread)
> {
> - return 0;
> + if (strncmp(thread->maps->machine->env->arch, "aarch64", 7) == 0)
> + return get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(sample, thread);
> + else
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 16:18 [PATCH 1/4] perf tools: record aarch64 registers automatically Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: add a mechanism to inject stack frames Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: enable dwarf_callchain_users on arm64 Alexandre Truong
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: determine if LR is the return address Alexandre Truong
2021-01-24 0:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-01-25 9:39 ` James Clark
2021-02-08 15:39 ` James Clark [this message]
2021-02-10 12:05 ` Alexandre Truong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3184a838-9784-eb86-09ad-ceadabcd3381@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=al.grant@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.truong@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wilco.dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®