From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751058AbVHKOnA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:43:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751059AbVHKOnA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:43:00 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:25735 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751056AbVHKOm7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:42:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:42:58 +0200 (MEST) From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, matthew@wil.cx, michael.kerrisk@gmx.net MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050811142047.GE10030@fieldses.org> Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_fcntl(F_GETLEASE)_semantics=3F=3F?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #23581172 Message-ID: <31857.1123771378@www9.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Von: "J. Bruce Fields" > In any case, I haven't seen a real argument for reverting to the old > behaviour. I'd rather see an established standard, or a correct ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > real-world application that fails, not just some arbitrary test. Agreed -- though I'd phrase it as "documented specification". Cheers, Michael -- 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++