Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>]

Hello Krzysztof,

On 16/08/22 13:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2022 09:01, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Update bindings for TI K3 J7200 SoC which contains 5 ports (4 external
>> ports) CPSW5G module and add compatible for it.
>>
>> Changes made:
>>     - Add new compatible ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss for CPSW5G.
>>     - Extend pattern properties for new compatible.
>>     - Change maximum number of CPSW ports to 4 for new compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> index b8281d8be940..5366a367c387 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ properties:
>>        - ti,am654-cpsw-nuss
>>        - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
>>        - ti,am642-cpsw-nuss
>> +      - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
> 
> Keep some order in the list, so maybe before j721e.

Thank you for reviewing the patch. I will move ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
above ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss in the v5 series.

> 
>>  
>>    reg:
>>      maxItems: 1
>> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ properties:
>>          const: 0
>>  
>>      patternProperties:
>> -      port@[1-2]:
>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>          type: object
>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>  
>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>          properties:
>>            reg:
>>              minimum: 1
>> -            maximum: 2
>> +            maximum: 4
>>              description: CPSW port number
>>  
>>            phys:
>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>  
>>      additionalProperties: false
>>  
>> +if:
> 
> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false

allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
additionalProperties:false would be fine.

Regards,
Siddharth.