Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: psci: Add trace for PSCI domain idle

[Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>]

On 1/20/25 01:36, Keita Morisaki wrote:
> The trace event cpu_idle provides insufficient information for debugging
> PSCI requests due to lacking access to determined PSCI domain idle
> states. The cpu_idle usually only shows -1, 0, or 1 regardless how many
> idle states the power domain has.
> 
> Add new trace events namely psci_domain_idle_enter and
> psci_domain_idle_exit to trace enter and exit events with a determined
> idle state.
> 
> These new trace events will help developers debug CPUidle issues on ARM
> systems using PSCI by providing more detailed information about the
> requested idle states.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keita Morisaki <keyz@google.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: Split the ftrace event into two (psci_domain_idle_(enter|exit))
> 		and rephrase the commit message accordingly. Rebased onto the latest.


Which makes it different to cpu_idle event FWIW.

> 
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c |  3 +++
>  include/trace/events/power.h   | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> index 2562dc001fc1..dd8d776d6e39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> 
>  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <trace/events/power.h>
> 
>  #include "cpuidle-psci.h"
>  #include "dt_idle_states.h"
> @@ -74,7 +75,9 @@ static __cpuidle int __psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	if (!state)
>  		state = states[idx];
> 
> +	trace_psci_domain_idle_enter(dev->cpu, state, s2idle);
>  	ret = psci_cpu_suspend_enter(state) ? -1 : idx;
> +	trace_psci_domain_idle_exit(dev->cpu, state, s2idle);

Not tracking ret seems odd, is that fine?