From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kirill@shutemov.name, hughd@google.com, aaron.lu@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: remove use_zero_page sysfs knob
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:37:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3238b5d2-fd89-a6be-0382-027a24a4d3ad@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807201300290.224013@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 7/20/18 1:02 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>> By digging into the original review, it looks use_zero_page sysfs knob
>>> was added to help ease-of-testing and give user a way to mitigate
>>> refcounting overhead.
>>>
>>> It has been a few years since the knob was added at the first place, I
>>> think we are confident that it is stable enough. And, since commit
>>> 6fcb52a56ff60 ("thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter"),
>>> it looks refcounting overhead has been reduced significantly.
>>>
>>> Other than the above, the value of the knob is always 1 (enabled by
>>> default), I'm supposed very few people turn it off by default.
>>>
>>> So, it sounds not worth to still keep this knob around.
>> Probably OK. Might not be OK, nobody knows.
>>
>> It's been there for seven years so another six months won't kill us.
>> How about as an intermediate step we add a printk("use_zero_page is
>> scheduled for removal. Please contact linux-mm@kvack.org if you need
>> it").
>>
> We disable the huge zero page through this interface, there were issues
> related to the huge zero page shrinker (probably best to never free a
> per-node huge zero page after allocated) and CVE-2017-1000405 for huge
> dirty COW.
Thanks for the information. It looks the CVE has been resolved by commit
a8f97366452ed491d13cf1e44241bc0b5740b1f0 ("mm, thp: Do not make page
table dirty unconditionally in touch_p[mu]d()"), which is in 4.15 already.
What was the shrinker related issue? I'm supposed it has been resolved,
right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-20 18:13 Yang Shi
2018-07-20 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-20 20:02 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-20 20:37 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2018-07-20 21:05 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-20 23:49 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-22 3:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-23 20:28 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-23 21:33 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-23 21:49 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-24 9:08 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-24 20:32 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-20 21:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-20 23:51 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-23 20:31 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-23 21:52 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-23 23:14 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3238b5d2-fd89-a6be-0382-027a24a4d3ad@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®