mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhangjianhua (E)" <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <joey.gouly@arm.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:03:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32552071-9e0f-b86b-202a-5cdf20871f59@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZL+gr8b/HfpwVKdf@arm.com>


在 2023/7/25 18:15, Catalin Marinas 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:47:46PM +0800, zhangjianhua (E) wrote:
>> 在 2023/7/25 12:22, Anshuman Khandual 写道:
>>> On 7/24/23 20:41, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 05:27:51PM +0000, Zhang Jianhua wrote:
>>>>> When building with W=1, the following warning occurs.
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:129:41: error: "PUD_SHIFT" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror=undef]
>>>>>     129 | #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT            PUD_SHIFT
>>>>>         |                                         ^~~~~~~~~
>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:142:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT’
>>>>>     142 | #if ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT < SECTION_SIZE_BITS
>>>>>         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Another thing that's missing here is that the warning is probably when
>>>> this file is included from asm-offests.h or some .S file.
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>>> index 577773870b66..51bdce66885d 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>>> @@ -125,12 +125,14 @@
>>>>>     * (64k granule), or a multiple that can be mapped using contiguous bits
>>>>>     * in the page tables: 32 * PMD_SIZE (16k granule)
>>>>>     */
>>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)
>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) && defined(PUD_SHIFT)
>>>>>    #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT		PUD_SHIFT
>>>> That's not the correct fix since PUD_SHIFT should always be defined.
>>>> When CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3, pgtable-types.h includes
>>>> asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h and this defines PUD_SHIFT. We either got
>>> Right, PUD_SHIFT is always defined irrespective of page table levels.
>>>
>>>> ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT defined in the wrong file or kernel-pgtable.h does
>>>> not pull the relevant headers (either directly or via an included
>>>> header). Even if kernel-pgtable.h ends up including the nopud/nopmd
>>>> headers, P*D_SHIFT is guarded by an #indef __ASSEMBLY__ in those files.
>>>>
>>>> Something like below appears to fix this, though I'm not particularly
>>>> fond of guarding the ARM64_MEMSTART_* definitions by #ifndef
>>>> __ASSEMBLY__ for no apparent reason (could add a comment though):
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------8<---------------------------
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>> index 577773870b66..fcea7e87a6ca 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@
>>>>    #define SWAPPER_RX_MMUFLAGS	(SWAPPER_RW_MMUFLAGS | PTE_RDONLY)
>>>>    #endif
>>>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>> +
>>>>    /*
>>>>     * To make optimal use of block mappings when laying out the linear
>>>>     * mapping, round down the base of physical memory to a size that can
>>>> @@ -145,4 +147,6 @@
>>>>    #define ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN	(1UL << ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT)
>>>>    #endif
>>>> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>> +
>>>>    #endif	/* __ASM_KERNEL_PGTABLE_H */
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>>> index e4944d517c99..22b36f2d5d93 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>>    #define __ASM_PGTABLE_HWDEF_H
>>>>    #include <asm/memory.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/pgtable-types.h>
>>>>    /*
>>>>     * Number of page-table levels required to address 'va_bits' wide
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>>>> index b8f158ae2527..ae86e66fdb11 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>>>>    #include <asm/types.h>
>>>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>> +
>>>>    typedef u64 pteval_t;
>>>>    typedef u64 pmdval_t;
>>>>    typedef u64 pudval_t;
>>>> @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ typedef struct { pteval_t pgprot; } pgprot_t;
>>>>    #define pgprot_val(x)	((x).pgprot)
>>>>    #define __pgprot(x)	((pgprot_t) { (x) } )
>>>> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>> +
>>>>    #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 2
>>>>    #include <asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h>
>>>>    #elif CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3
>>>> -----------------------8<---------------------------
>>>>
>>>> To avoid guarding the ARM64_MEMSTART_* definitions, we could instead
>>>> move the P*D_SHIFT definitions in asm-generic/pgtable-nop*d.h outside
>>>> the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ block.
>>> OR could ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT and ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN computation blocks
>>> be moved inside arch/arm64/mm/init.c, where it is used exclusively. Seems
>>> to be solving the problem as well.
> That's fine by me, better than adding the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ around
> them.
>
>> This method can avoid the current compilation warning, but does not
>> solve the problem that PUD_SHIFT and PMD_SHIFT undefined in fact, and
>> it is contrary to XXX_SHIFT should always be defined. Maybe it would
>> be more appropriate to solve this issue directly.
> For .c files, we can solve this by including asm/pgtable-types.h in
> asm/pgtable-hwdef.h. This still leaves P*D_SHIFT undefined for .S files
> since the generic nop*d.h headers guard the shifts with !__ASSEMBLY__
> but do we really care about this? I haven't seen any other warning of
> P*D_SHIFT not being defined. If you do want to solve these, just go and
> change the generic headers to take the shift out of the asm guard. I
> don't think it's worth it.
OK, agree, I will send a new patch for Anshuman's method.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-07-25 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24 17:27 Zhang Jianhua
2023-07-24 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-25  4:22   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-25  8:47     ` zhangjianhua (E)
2023-07-25 10:15       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-25 12:03         ` zhangjianhua (E) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32552071-9e0f-b86b-202a-5cdf20871f59@huawei.com \
    --to=chris.zjh@huawei.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®