On Wed, 2026-03-25 at 17:07 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 01:02:22PM +0000, Markus Probst wrote: > > On Sat, 2026-03-21 at 13:32 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 21/03/2026 13:17, Markus Probst wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2026-03-21 at 11:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 11:09:53PM +0100, Markus Probst wrote: > > > > > > + > > > > > > +examples: > > > > > > + - | > > > > > > + #include > > > > > > + > > > > > > + embedded-controller { > > > > > > + compatible = "synology,microp"; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + power-led { > > > > > > + color = ; > > > > > > + function = LED_FUNCTION_POWER; > > > > > > + }; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + status-led { > > > > > > + color = ; > > > > > > + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS; > > > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > > > Where are other leds? Binding mentions 4. > > > > > > > > > Status and Power leds exist on every Synology NAS model I am aware of. > > > > But there are models which have additionally a usb or alert led. The > > > > device nodes for those leds should only be present, if they exist > > > > physically on the device. > > > > > > Then help me to understand - are these different models? > > Yes, even with different CPU architectures. > > How much the "microp" device differs is not clear, but the > > communication protocol is the same. > > > > > > EC is not a generic purpose component and is tightly coupled with the > > > actual board it is being present on. Unless exactly same board is used > > > in different models (unlikely) then the compatible defines the LEDs and > > > they are not needed in DT. > > So for instance "synology,ds923p-microp", "synology,ds723p-microp" etc. > > ? > > > > I can do that, but that would be many. > > How many is many? Estimated 300. As a side note: I only have 1 model I can test the driver with. > > > Having it generic seems more flexible. > > Is there firmware for these ECs? If so is it the same or different > firmware for each device? If the former or the functionality is really > trivial, then I'd be more comfortable with 1 or a few compatibles. The firmware is not public and the exact differences between them isn't documented. The communication protocol is the same though. > > Generic means you'll need to add quirk properties when there is some > difference the OS needs to handle which we'll reject. So stuck with one > compatible and no way to distinguish different ECs is anything but > flexible. Describing the physical leds that are present on the NAS device are not quirk properties, at least in my definition. Thanks - Markus Probst > > Rob