From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FD73A1D6; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705925756; cv=none; b=dm+SevIE0aURJssPAXc0JDpGoyIOyoTMlTGbhHAm8Ee1d+l61fYRX/urOmmGJDbj64o30jtkburHzg63Dt0apCtgchjZ5F+qj16nvkis8F83Su+3skCO+fXoa2+fD/1Dgf4MMX2v6phJ2Wl87cPUmLUdEdSOOPpymf+VDzwpr/o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705925756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JlI6oJ4yUpkIyWemM/YYc6/lnR2MeUov9gvivfsE8fI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cPd5ziyYn2EDRpaO1njuxSNrvNdieG5xMFBGsmpdlz5T5LjNX0Ava8zNrW3obRHiyKQ0PyB2K3ho5Dy/evMl9yLc32x367uwLuOdan+rbx87p+QWIhTgTPF8Sqi6pkWVMgKVyRLY1N7qwUM8R4dbv9ReWhTPa5eNQFmWblxOOrw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b=aVUkt6ik; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b="aVUkt6ik" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1705925737; x=1706530537; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=JlI6oJ4yUpkIyWemM/YYc6/lnR2MeUov9gvivfsE8fI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=aVUkt6ik4gUZeuYOBMXqAs+0YCD5aH6EVw3mslrH0x+3tvJ/PsyrAQT5+8upnshQ hJb2cp4LnCXrGBVTdzT+f0FnpsEoY2jrSIGL7Qu/nTSDIRFZtK0yz7Rj3kGjtA1kK +SGHis0SoZ2Z29UkTwJlmpi2nGDXXzUwpBhgB4oa6RHICpMmVFAVLhhVNBQpEdPWu AGSX5s7H8LuJkRtPO5uU6qylB5VOUCi5acGpWI5/ZRMxVrfsbg41D0wfzfz/ozdK9 yhRepbikmU+7JQXN0ovoV+g+uNkyOCzzfe9YYWMwD7aoAT6VnoKZO2guKD4/ZI2Fw S5dAuqUMrO7OHqiHYA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.87.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8T7E-1rWGvw3I3c-004hJE; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:15:36 +0100 Message-ID: <32eef8de-1e95-4e4e-85c5-9cc881b75bdf@web.de> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:15:36 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [0/3] dmaengine: timb_dma: Adjustments for td_alloc_init_desc() Content-Language: en-GB To: Vinod Koul , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , cocci@inria.fr References: From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Mn5UYh7mrmxQ0WaeWCTZLO++m6xX+ndy1U4RL6USooOPRiI2s3o YAFhZ1lMh/Qr9xsuSmfYRicdlojXl5ltelqkAnJmXeWKXZBDEV9gFE+HwQtcbBZ5pT29fQM SJPixYJXtJYtcJ9MhHqq+d1yx7VuzH9oG2hyLP3iEeCmDmfiOa5GaTD0dzp+STV3Z+N23xT u3kvQ6TBLC4klc35uhnmQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:efwrYv3DkmE=;f9/ozwvaAeYDo6XGikObS3hiJJp u6URE5Ns/fSKfVfLK2QcKl5c9cLYzynW1zScAJya4QcuLVCwNNCoXjcYQO3fvCWJltKn9ETbV IS09zzdZY6wEFxUV1JL/d+H9XPXb0d/cGTAB8Ck3M3uilqqVJkmHDkdmwpJ6lwD1OCFMzDLfw m48WsZ6y4gzaR2EbhkI1qrLGQWYl8KSsDETSXfK2N5sQ6cgi2pmDHviC3f8KTVwPpAy9VrZ+g bzTgZ7aFvAuHpKq9NMprZoFqhAEcbeZE6OnTnOaL/t8ahW3wtHI8e6rTXCyUfW5aS3DuYKc3L uW3EQY/STQbHbHCV2/8AL3xmxkU3iPm/vWEFCB+w1aPN+BNlMGNm6P5VUnyBRNm4reFwfTfuw tLRtRnRBHRPyr7UXOziQknJ+e/6z1ivhk9MHM+KHMvROll09H/idbW3Qk2W1AkiTtqDIHqVxo h0HqGhtUelAA4Cm7x/RlPLe8W+TLWff0vffJEEVH7vPDRw/EIgOW3r6eGwxCvZOfglugyh1dN gThzTkXHP4trMhr3g4Olj/BuArvGAwlQuiV5bJmgDYUGGFodVVglg/xO8hwzI4CRPQpWt3uz2 aiGhX5Uf/mnr5RG0OBMmuPo/PUEdt1WDBP+Diocv3q8oC+WNtwawwqoNK0XGwEdJ/FKJp1qbG OAjRmLwLYEULjhOMK1b0HezRLNio3NcB7NaaOBI047y+P/A/auGw3qWoQnGAjktdE1/61a39l eONsPqv4kfzzI5OKPbF1/mJylHz1AqYMUbdzRncSMA7gRwWjAcH9U+s1XnBFkbUm5KqR5RYaj tRMkkBsWGRLG2YkbHovTK9mda3vaYBAWUrwczM0rjJi/nlvX9Ak+F88ONR2P1jU7ojugh+8lf DJzR0u/0xbaYHrLgCROMtt2+VJqc3WGAnKxdIB5FbhUnXyqK6r1VXkCYXeIn5c+Ug7buMkN1H 8WEBkg== >> A few update suggestions were taken into account >> from static source code analysis. > > was this anaysis done by you Mostly, yes. > or some tool reported this. Some scripts for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software) can hel= p to point places out for desirable source code transformations. > Frabkly I dont see much value in these patches, It is a pity that you view the presented update steps in this direction. > can you fix something real please You might occasionally find adjustments from my patch selection more worth= while. Regards, Markus