mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
	Zi Li <zi.li@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [WARN] LOCKDEP: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:59:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33103ab3-6237-4215-b8de-bef680bef691@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25e2293a-f49e-4bc9-bf80-efb66d87c7cb@redhat.com>



On 2025/5/27 13:53, Waiman Long wrote:
> MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS is composed of 2 parts - (1 << 
> MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS) and AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH (5). I believe that 
> the average lock chain length is probably bigger than 5 now. We will 
> have to check the /proc/lockdep file to figure out if we should increase 
> it as well. Anyway, I think we should increase 

Yeah, just checked `/proc/lockdep_stats` on my machine, and it shows
'max locking depth: 30':

$ cat /proc/lockdep_stats
  lock-classes:                         2074 [max: 8192]
  direct dependencies:                 22596 [max: 32768]
  indirect dependencies:              124267
  all direct dependencies:            527384
  dependency chains:                   51354 [max: 65536]
  dependency chain hlocks used:       327679 [max: 327680]
  dependency chain hlocks lost:            1
  in-hardirq chains:                     209
  in-softirq chains:                    1068
  in-process chains:                   50076
  stack-trace entries:                306274 [max: 524288]
  number of stack traces:              11921
  number of stack hash chains:          8482
  combined max dependencies:      2651851138
  hardirq-safe locks:                     85
  hardirq-unsafe locks:                 1301
  softirq-safe locks:                    284
  softirq-unsafe locks:                 1123
  irq-safe locks:                        303
  irq-unsafe locks:                     1301
  hardirq-read-safe locks:                 4
  hardirq-read-unsafe locks:             312
  softirq-read-safe locks:                12
  softirq-read-unsafe locks:             307
  irq-read-safe locks:                    12
  irq-read-unsafe locks:                 312
  uncategorized locks:                   352
  unused locks:                            0
  max locking depth:                      30
  max bfs queue depth:                   379
  max lock class index:                 2073
  debug_locks:                             0

  zapped classes:                          6
  zapped lock chains:                    163
  large chain blocks:                      0

And, the average lock chain depth could be calculated as:

dependency chain hlocks used (327679) / dependency chains (51354) ~= 6.38

Seems like we should also consider bumping 'AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH' to
something like 7 or higher.

> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to at least 17, those we may still hit the 
> "MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low" if we run a variety of different 
> workloads without reboot.

Agreed. We may still hit this issue, but tweaking these values can make
it less likely ;)

Thanks,
Lance


      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-27 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-27  2:02 Lance Yang
2025-05-27  4:48 ` Waiman Long
2025-05-27  5:33   ` Lance Yang
2025-05-27  5:53     ` Waiman Long
2025-05-27 11:59       ` Lance Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33103ab3-6237-4215-b8de-bef680bef691@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zi.li@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®