From: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mark device nodes only in case of successful instantiation
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 22:20:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33118B65-9BF4-45AF-AC55-B44BECB5BBD1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39e8d53a-a93d-feeb-044f-9b1b239dff21@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
Hi Ralf,
> On Oct 16, 2016, at 12:55 , Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> On 10/16/2016 10:49 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> (Cc i2c)
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Ralf Ramsauer
>> <ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> wrote:
>>> Instantiated SPI device nodes are marked with OF_POPULATE. This was
>>> introduced in bd6c164. On unloading, loaded device nodes will of course
>>> be unmarked. The problem are nodes the fail during initialisation: If a
>>> node failed during registration, it won't be unloaded and hence never be
>>> unmarked again.
>>>
>>> So if a SPI driver module is unloaded and reloaded, it will skip nodes
>>> that failed before.
>>>
>>> Skip device nodes that are already populated and mark them only in case
>>> of success.
>>>
>>> Fixes: bd6c164 ("spi: Mark instantiated device nodes with OF_POPULATE")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> ---
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> imagine the following situation: you loaded a spi driver as module, but
>>> it fails to instantiate, because of some reasons (e.g. some resources,
>>> like gpios, might be in use in userspace).
>>>
>>> When reloading the driver, _all_ nodes, including previously failed
>>> ones, should be probed again. This is not the case at the moment.
>>> Current behaviour only re-registers nodes that were previously
>>> successfully loaded.
>>>
>>> This small patches fixes this behaviour. I stumbled over this while
>>> working on a spi driver.
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>>> drivers/spi/spi.c | 7 +++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
>>> index 200ca22..f96a04e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
>>> @@ -1604,12 +1604,15 @@ static void of_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> for_each_available_child_of_node(master->dev.of_node, nc) {
>>> - if (of_node_test_and_set_flag(nc, OF_POPULATED))
>>> + if (of_node_check_flag(nc, OF_POPULATED))
>>> continue;
>>> spi = of_register_spi_device(master, nc);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(spi))
>>> + if (IS_ERR(spi)) {
>>> dev_warn(&master->dev, "Failed to create SPI device for %s\n",
>>> nc->full_name);
>>> + continue;
>>> + }
>>> + of_node_set_flag(nc, OF_POPULATED);
>>
>> I think it's safer to keep the atomic test-and-set, but clear the flag on
>> failure, cfr. of_platform_device_create_pdata() and of_amba_device_create().
> Ack, no prob. Let me change this in the next version.
>>
>> Shouldn't of_spi_notify() be fixed, too?
> Right, that's almost the same path.
>>
>> The same issue exists for i2c in of_i2c_register_devices() and of_i2c_notify(),
>> which is what I had used as an example.
> Good old c&p ;-)
> I'll fix and test that tomorrow and come back with two patches, as it
> touches different subsystems.
>
Thanks for this. This is a very rare case that’s easy to slip through.
It is good to be consistent :)
> Best
> Ralf
>>
Regards
— Pantelis
>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>>
>> Geert
>>
>> --
>> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>>
>> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
>> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>> -- Linus Torvalds
>>
>
>
> --
> Ralf Ramsauer
> GPG: 0x8F10049B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-14 19:31 Ralf Ramsauer
2016-10-16 8:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-16 9:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-10-16 9:55 ` Ralf Ramsauer
2016-10-17 19:20 ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2016-10-17 21:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-10-17 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33118B65-9BF4-45AF-AC55-B44BECB5BBD1@gmail.com \
--to=pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®