From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361DF2DB790 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773854483; cv=none; b=ilyEHM1lHz2a3Y250TlrUEP3jpNmxdj/OmN+XtqeaeoywP450rmSGAYgeDs40dGfgN/XD7kZtmkp/GuGe/TiVlszb57VlDty33vD7SDfAuGzgmxST354UykW3xRq1PTTRL31w5IhJBG64+OhdmfyvXPTAihXdwIp3ftGNBfGX7k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773854483; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dpcTKw8HGt4a+5qT/hDFPQtUrxlgUMTf/iolgzgi8KI=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=h0ibsvSCD3dNbI4B7zyA2PBuTk5zzUL5pZROkyIfe71CQjLr+EuYIE/f7vxv4Q5Hav6HQwkogeZl08hkAtFBUg3XmdLTvS87YPKnjqmIl8NWWLRPZc9DHkfM1gCAslUYX1E0fk6+hDau/UgETuXSjNVx9xDF8/ylJVoeH7IHWx4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=DvlwfmIH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=XXvQQRze; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="DvlwfmIH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="XXvQQRze" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4212D14001C6; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-02 ([10.202.2.81]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:21:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1773854481; x=1773940881; bh=jagtLdQJsGMP0CDRK1vPex3dVzuRTMvC17L8mq7uFuw=; b= DvlwfmIHU8BAYASjuJxNmADSNiUiHUyphkCmYoVaro2VQTbPhnvIKSQL1FDtsUQr Hiv3L6/2Dv2C7z1i4CV6lrzt23wK4t9OLfAh1C4kLlUSALzDMy9BDrgrcbknZ9lW d7jzVCMEH3jjE9GymvYkpVzzgxiIZ31XpzJK1qrTfKRzpUw+9ggVTJrTTCyjDWBW zls7N5Fz1q0Gf4kc+2WnbM8/61I5YuuHx+I1xXwHENu2sI85wO24oRKXQanZMNdZ 3dJkbx92fsr2EGV/S2aACHW7KhJWFvIeDRWe+BHsnUv4fUZRvV9qv1EBZECZgwWb 6xZ1wM2X58Gdw3F9Knf2tw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1773854481; x= 1773940881; bh=jagtLdQJsGMP0CDRK1vPex3dVzuRTMvC17L8mq7uFuw=; b=X XvQQRzeGfDyEY6AvHla+xu9C0ywBxK5uRBc/Eiutx9qPw/Udn5wnSAt/28T0jCmf 84DX3mMGgqDSMT48Enj0UgiLt0xFuMNYmRjFufO05yt6PZC5ip8RbvPDPP2DUFY8 XFe+az1AKqlKIuxfoQi+xDh/ZAtR9gukqtC0rYniwTfALiyf4Mp/prR3sJfxvAm0 2SZi6RCoOgwqFUnDQwUVm9LaUo663R+6S6s+YGYTq4F84sCHOXWMS72+PRdG51PL WN2N4LyUvKa7L73WARo4QMScxLj2nX5sYgrOO4VaDYcpv9JA3n3FRQuTlHOVuS+J QQ5+J9ULFycpSMzs0o2yg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdeftdegjedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedftehrnhgu uceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepvdfhvdekueduveffffetgfdvveefvdelhedvvdegjedvfeehtdeggeevheefleej necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghrnh gusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhu thdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhgvgigrnhgurhgvrdgsvghllhhonhhisegsohhothhlihhnrd gtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhushhtihhniheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthht ohepkhhriihksehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhhsfieskhgvrh hnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqrghrmhdqkhgvrhhnvghlsehlihhs thhsrdhinhhfrhgruggvrggurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqrhgvrghlth gvkhdqshhotgeslhhishhtshdrihhnfhhrrgguvggrugdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehs ohgtsehlihhsthhsrdhlihhnuhigrdguvghvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihrdhhuhgrnhhgse hrvggrlhhtvghkrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepvghlvggrnhhorhdrlhhinhesrhgvrghl thgvkhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D3CC5700065; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:21:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: Aj4MA5-83_jg Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:20:42 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Yu-Chun_Lin_=5B=E6=9E=97=E7=A5=90=E5=90=9B=5D?= , linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org Cc: "Drew Fustini" , =?UTF-8?Q?CY=5FHuang=5B=E9=BB=83=E9=89=A6=E6=99=8F=5D?= , "Stanley Chang" , =?UTF-8?Q?James_Tai_=5B=E6=88=B4=E5=BF=97=E5=B3=B0=5D?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, soc@lists.linux.dev, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Alexandre Belloni" , "Linus Walleij" Message-Id: <3316207d-c7f7-453c-a0ec-e9dffc26a469@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20260318114047.2804171-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> <405a9783-0f77-4ce0-8288-43eaada09cff@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: Fix memory node unit-address mismatch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 18, 2026, at 16:27, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > On 18.03.26 15:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> I drop this from soc patchwork and please do not send code for review >>> there, but either fix the lack of involvement from Realtek or let's = drop >>> the platform if Realtek does not care. >>=20 >> As Andreas has not replied to the MAINTAINERS updated, I would >> prefer to merge both that and this patch in the bugfix branch >> for 7.0. > > Sorry for that, still lacking time, but at least receiving now... > > I'm happy in general for someone with more time taking over. > > Last week I spoke with Realtek (at EW) about testing the newer SoCs. > As a reminder, the mainline removal of TEXT_OFFSET broke my ability to=20 > test the older SoCs that I had access to. I hear that Kent and other=20 > recent SoCs do not have the same bootloader limitations anymore. > > We would need to consider moving me from M to R and possibly changing = my=20 > email from .de to .com due to recurring quota overflows. Ok, sounds good. Yu-Chun, can you send an updated patch for the maintain= ers file doing this? > I.e., new maintainers would need to queue patches and send pull reques= ts=20 > to soc then. Are they set up with GPG keys / kernel.org tree to actual= ly=20 > take over on their own? As I understand, the MAINTAINERS entry is one of the prerequisites for getting a kernel.org account, so I would start with that. I don't know whether they have signatures from anyone on the keyring yet, but I'm sure that can be arranged. > As for review, there was one other review discussion about ISO/Misc=20 > areas that I found concerning: Those areas have been clearly documente= d=20 > and (on the older SoCs I know) contained registers wildly lumped=20 > together (from kernel PoV), so that having them in DT and accessing vi= a=20 > regmap seemed the best way to me, compared to trying to map individual=20 > words to specific drivers. My old branches may contain some example=20 > usage in queued but non-merged drivers. (Amlogic may also have similar=20 > concepts of always-on vs. PD-controlled peripherals grouped in DT?) Right, that makes sense, and this is consistent with how we use syscon o= n many platforms. > Another open thing would be help with mailing list moderation, if we=20 > want to continue using it. Any review responses by non-subscribers add=20 > to its moderation queue (plus any spam). Maybe just drop Moderation altogether then? Arnd