From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] cpufreq governor improvements
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:08:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3329748.lhJgppdTt9@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
Hi All,
Here's a buch of patches that slightly improve the ondemand/conservative code
on top of the current linux-next branch of my tree (linux-pm.git).
They don't change the way things work fundamentally, but some minor differences
may be noticeable.
[1/9] Do not do atomic_inc() in gov_cancel_work() as there's no reason to do it
(new version).
[2/9] Avoid atomic ops in scheduler paths if not absolutely necessary (new version).
[3/9] Fix computation of the contribution from nice in dbs_check_cpu().
[4/9] Clean up load-related computations in the common governor code.
[5/9] Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback.
[6/9] Make store_sampling_rate() reset the sample delay to 0 (instead of setting
it to the new sampling rate) to avoid weird interactions with the ondemand
governor.
[7/9] Move rate_mult to struct policy_dbs_info.
[8/9] Simplify conditionals in od_dbs_timer().
[9/9] Use microseconds in computations related to sample delay.
The series have been (lightly) tested on Toshiba Portege R500.
Thanks,
Rafael
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 1:08 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-15 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: governor: Simplify gov_cancel_work() slightly Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 5:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] cpufreq: governor: Avoid atomic operations in hot paths Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 6:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 8:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check_cpu() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Clean up load-related computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] cpufreq: governor: Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] cpufreq: governor: Reset sample delay in store_sampling_rate() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] cpufreq: governor: Move rate_mult to struct policy_dbs Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify conditionals in od_dbs_timer() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] cpufreq: governor: Use microseconds in sample delay computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:58 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3329748.lhJgppdTt9@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®