mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: cding@ddn.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: invalidate page cache after sync and async direct writes
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:56:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <332ba149-035f-48c1-8bed-a586334ac068@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309-xfstests-generic-451-v3-1-bb6ad2f59512@ddn.com>



On 3/9/26 4:35 PM, Cheng Ding via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Cheng Ding <cding@ddn.com>
> 
> Fixes xfstests generic/451, similar to how commit b359af8275a9 ("fuse:
> Invalidate the page cache after FOPEN_DIRECT_IO write") fixes xfstests
> generic/209.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Ding <cding@ddn.com>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>

> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Address review comments: fix typo
> - Address review comments: move sb_init_dio_done_wq() to fuse_direct_IO()
>   Note: We could skip sb_init_dio_done_wq() when io->blocking is true, but
>   I opted to keep the change simpler.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260306-xfstests-generic-451-v2-1-93b2d540304b@ddn.com
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Address review comments: move invalidation from fuse_direct_io() to
>   fuse_direct_write_iter()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260303-async-dio-aio-cache-invalidation-v1-1-fba0fd0426c3@ddn.com
> ---
>  fs/fuse/file.c   | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index b1bb7153cb78..c43fe74cdd46 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
>  #include <linux/iomap.h>
>  
> +int sb_init_dio_done_wq(struct super_block *sb);
> +
>  static int fuse_send_open(struct fuse_mount *fm, u64 nodeid,
>  			  unsigned int open_flags, int opcode,
>  			  struct fuse_open_out *outargp)
> @@ -629,6 +631,19 @@ static ssize_t fuse_get_res_by_io(struct fuse_io_priv *io)
>  	return io->bytes < 0 ? io->size : io->bytes;
>  }
>  
> +static void fuse_aio_invalidate_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_io_priv *io = container_of(work, struct fuse_io_priv, work);
> +	struct address_space *mapping = io->iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
> +	ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
> +	pgoff_t start = io->offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	pgoff_t end = (io->offset + res - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, start, end);
> +	io->iocb->ki_complete(io->iocb, res);
> +	kref_put(&io->refcnt, fuse_io_release);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * In case of short read, the caller sets 'pos' to the position of
>   * actual end of fuse request in IO request. Otherwise, if bytes_requested
> @@ -661,10 +676,11 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
>  	spin_unlock(&io->lock);
>  
>  	if (!left && !io->blocking) {
> +		struct inode *inode = file_inode(io->iocb->ki_filp);
> +		struct address_space *mapping = io->iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
>  		ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
>  
>  		if (res >= 0) {
> -			struct inode *inode = file_inode(io->iocb->ki_filp);
>  			struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
>  			struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
>  
> @@ -673,6 +689,17 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
>  			spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
>  		}
>  
> +		if (io->write && res > 0 && mapping->nrpages) {
> +			/*
> +			 * As in generic_file_direct_write(), invalidate after the
> +			 * write, to invalidate read-ahead cache that may have competed
> +			 * with the write.
> +			 */
> +			INIT_WORK(&io->work, fuse_aio_invalidate_worker);
> +			queue_work(inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq, &io->work);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
>  		io->iocb->ki_complete(io->iocb, res);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1738,15 +1765,6 @@ ssize_t fuse_direct_io(struct fuse_io_priv *io, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  	if (res > 0)
>  		*ppos = pos;
>  
> -	if (res > 0 && write && fopen_direct_io) {
> -		/*
> -		 * As in generic_file_direct_write(), invalidate after the
> -		 * write, to invalidate read-ahead cache that may have competed
> -		 * with the write.
> -		 */
> -		invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, idx_from, idx_to);
> -	}
> -
>  	return res > 0 ? res : err;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_direct_io);
> @@ -1785,6 +1803,8 @@ static ssize_t fuse_direct_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>  static ssize_t fuse_direct_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> +	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +	loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>  	ssize_t res;
>  	bool exclusive;
>  
> @@ -1801,6 +1821,16 @@ static ssize_t fuse_direct_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>  					     FUSE_DIO_WRITE);
>  			fuse_write_update_attr(inode, iocb->ki_pos, res);
>  		}
> +		if (res > 0 && mapping->nrpages) {
> +			/*
> +			 * As in generic_file_direct_write(), invalidate after
> +			 * write, to invalidate read-ahead cache that may have
> +			 * with the write.
> +			 */
> +			invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> +				pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +				(pos + res - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	fuse_dio_unlock(iocb, exclusive);
>  
> @@ -2826,6 +2856,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter), shortened = 0;
>  	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
>  	struct fuse_io_priv *io;
> +	bool async = ff->fm->fc->async_dio;
>  
>  	pos = offset;
>  	inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> @@ -2834,6 +2865,12 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	if ((iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) && (offset >= i_size))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if ((iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) && async && !inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq) {
> +		ret = sb_init_dio_done_wq(inode->i_sb);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	io = kmalloc_obj(struct fuse_io_priv);
>  	if (!io)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2849,7 +2886,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	 * By default, we want to optimize all I/Os with async request
>  	 * submission to the client filesystem if supported.
>  	 */
> -	io->async = ff->fm->fc->async_dio;
> +	io->async = async;
>  	io->iocb = iocb;
>  	io->blocking = is_sync_kiocb(iocb);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index 7f16049387d1..6e8c8cf6b2c8 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ union fuse_file_args {
>  /** The request IO state (for asynchronous processing) */
>  struct fuse_io_priv {
>  	struct kref refcnt;
> +	struct work_struct work;
>  	int async;
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	unsigned reqs;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 3c9332f821aa11552f19c331c5aa5299c78c7c94
> change-id: 20260306-xfstests-generic-451-fed0f9d5a095
> 
> Best regards,

-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09  8:35 Cheng Ding via B4 Relay
2026-03-10  1:56 ` Jingbo Xu [this message]
2026-04-16  8:57 ` Jingbo Xu
2026-04-16 10:38 ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=332ba149-035f-48c1-8bed-a586334ac068@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
    --cc=cding@ddn.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®