From: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
"David Wilder" <dwilder@us.ibm.com>,
hch@lst.de, "Tom Zanussi" <zanussi@comcast.net>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:03:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33307c790809241403w236f2242y18ba44982d962287@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809241637400.6759@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
> OK, then how about this?
>
> Each page will start with a time stamp (I'm still aligning everything by 8
> bytes, just because it simplifies things). Then we can have a 3 byte
> (24 bit) counter offset? Then we can have a header that looks like:
>
> struct {
> unsigned char time[3];
> unsigned char length;
> unsigned char buff[];
> };
>
> This still allows me to have the 2048 byte size buffer.
>
> Or is 24 bits for time too small? The offest will be from the previous
> entry, and not the beginning of the page.
>
> If one defines a fixed size entry, we could just use the full 32 bits for
> the timestamp, since the length will be ignored in that case, and will
> become part of the buffer.
>
> Hence,
>
> struct {
> unsigned int time;
> unsigned char length;
> unsigend char buff[];
> };
How about we just steal 5 bits from the timestamp to indicate event
lengths up to 32 bytes, and if it's 0, that means there's a length
field following? Also that'd mean you could use a longer length field
and get beyond 256 bytes to 4096, without impacting most events.
struct {
u32 length:5, time_delta:27;
u16 length;
u8 buf[];
};
struct {
u32 length:5, time_delta:27; /* where length == 0 */
u8 buf[];
};
Obviously we could less than 5 bits, even just 1 for a flag ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-24 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-24 5:10 [RFC PATCH 0/3] An Unified tracing buffer (attempt) Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-24 15:47 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:56 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 18:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:49 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 17:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:37 ` David Miller
2008-09-24 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:51 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 21:24 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-09-24 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 21:03 ` Martin Bligh [this message]
2008-09-24 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 21:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-25 14:33 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-25 15:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 15:25 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 16:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 21:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 21:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-27 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 17:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-27 18:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 18:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 21:15 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 20:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 21:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 22:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 23:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 23:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-26 14:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-25 22:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-26 1:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 1:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 1:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 1:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 1:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 2:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 2:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 5:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 10:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 15:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 17:54 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 18:04 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:56 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 16:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ftrace: combine some print formating Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ftrace: hack in the ring buffer Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33307c790809241403w236f2242y18ba44982d962287@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zanussi@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome