From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] clk: Overwrite clk_hw::init with NULL during clk_register()
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:43:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3364c2b6d3c1f22e1310464ae2a6f9a4.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed953445-9c55-4658-af16-04eaa71d746e@tuxon.dev>
Quoting Claudiu Beznea (2025-02-15 05:55:51)
> Hi, Stephen,
>
> On 31.07.2019 22:35, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > We don't want clk provider drivers to use the init structure after clk
> > registration time, but we leave a dangling reference to it by means of
> > clk_hw::init. Let's overwrite the member with NULL during clk_register()
> > so that this can't be used anymore after registration time.
> >
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index c0990703ce54..efac620264a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -3566,6 +3566,14 @@ __clk_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw *hw)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > struct clk_core *core;
> > + const struct clk_init_data *init = hw->init;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The init data is not supposed to be used outside of registration path.
> > + * Set it to NULL so that provider drivers can't use it either and so that
> > + * we catch use of hw->init early on in the core.
> > + */
> > + hw->init = NULL;
>
> I found that this line impact the drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c driver when
> doing unbind/bind. The driver provides statically initialized hw.init
> object for registration, the hw.init pointers are set to NULL after clock
> registrations then the next registration (when re-binding) fails.
That's nice </sarcasm>. Yeah I suspect a lot of drivers would fail if
they're unbound and rebound right now, for various reasons including
what you mention. I think Doug or Bjorn was concerned that this pointer
was left dangling when it could potentially lead to some driver
accessing the stack. That's what started the whole series.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c
> index 9fe27dace111..c1776c313e9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c
> @@ -1068,7 +1069,7 @@ static int vc3_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &clk_div[i].hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "%s failed\n",
> - clk_div[i].hw.init->name);
> + "test");
> //clk_div[i].hw.init->name);
> }
>
> /* Register clk muxes */
> @@ -1082,7 +1083,7 @@ static int vc3_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &clk_mux[i].hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "%s failed\n",
> - clk_mux[i].hw.init->name);
> +
> "test");//clk_mux[i].hw.init->name);
> }
>
> /* Register clk outputs */
>
> Can you please let me know if this is a wrong pattern? I noticed there are
> other drivers following similar approach, e.g.:
> - drivers/clk/clk-axm5516.c
> - drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sm6350.c
> - drivers/clk/meson/c3-pll.c
Maybe we should only overwrite it to NULL when it succeeds. Or
inversely, restore the pointer when it fails so that drivers can print
the init->name. Of course, that doesn't fix the problem that a driver
may be stashing the init pointer in there anonymously, like the qcom
driver does.
Actually, I think what we want to do is pull that error message into
devm_clk_hw_register() and get rid of it everywhere else. Drivers will
still have to restore the pointer before registering if the driver is
unbound and bound. It isn't good to keep a pointer to the stack so I'd
like to keep the logic that knocks out the pointer.
---8<---
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Print an error when clk registration fails
We have a lot of driver code that prints an error message when
registering a clk fails. Do that in the core function instead to
consolidate code. This also helps drivers avoid the anti-pattern of
accessing the struct clk_hw::init pointer after registration.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 50faafbf5dda..88edeae7a1f4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -4397,6 +4397,13 @@ __clk_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw *hw)
fail_name:
kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
fail_out:
+ if (dev) {
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register clk '%s' (%pS)\n",
+ init->name, hw);
+ } else {
+ pr_err("%pOF: error %pe: failed to register clk '%s' (%pS)\n",
+ np, &ret, init->name, hw);
+ }
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
--
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 19:35 [PATCH 0/9] Make clk_hw::init NULL after clk registration Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] clk: actions: Don't reference clk_init_data after registration Stephen Boyd
2019-08-03 12:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-14 0:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-16 11:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-16 14:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/9] clk: lochnagar: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 8:07 ` Charles Keepax
2019-08-14 0:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 3/9] clk: meson: axg-audio: " Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:53 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-08-06 8:49 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-08-06 21:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-07 13:57 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-08-14 0:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 4/9] clk: qcom: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-04 17:49 ` Taniya Das
2019-08-14 0:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 5/9] clk: sirf: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-14 0:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 6/9] clk: socfpga: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 15:12 ` Dinh Nguyen
2019-08-01 16:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-14 0:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 7/9] clk: sprd: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 7:41 ` Baolin Wang
2019-08-02 1:57 ` Chunyan Zhang
2019-08-14 0:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 8/9] phy: ti: am654-serdes: " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-02 12:45 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-08-14 0:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-31 19:35 ` [PATCH 9/9] clk: Overwrite clk_hw::init with NULL during clk_register() Stephen Boyd
2019-08-08 16:14 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2019-08-14 0:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2025-02-15 13:55 ` Claudiu Beznea
2025-02-26 23:43 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3364c2b6d3c1f22e1310464ae2a6f9a4.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome