From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA714AEE2 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770795765; cv=none; b=Dx9ykO7rrBPg7dUKdvuBgX3HGSuszORy7cS7WNNPW0xeHq/y3PseHu7Usbh8t8fA2ge6y5ZG5SbSY2RGMAS0odDSlzi2i9hQaTMlAjD4T5nDZOUa5mWlc5AgFENcTOSbrpPTvxVqtkfm6fsIUMVhDKTLHNRr1qhtKqyYvgHOu0Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770795765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9+spGj3ppA3muGr5Rl3L3kB0mP5wMYkW/j5P1MGwVRE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mGaMGn1Jh634IvBtfhGUbZKtEn6Uu1UhkWO6J2avc9l5RcCVvRyb+pRgWIOVQJCMNWo1fflH+t1jJeuE2koM9QbvXqDs6CFLFrgUCdavb0/UQNqUMdljcMOnrHNMv1zDp8rhmNYT32M3iMy/Bw7e7/SDp1PyFhScPkAELCiSNXU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=0mxrcduV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="0mxrcduV" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C472A4E40C34; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9114E606BE; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 8D80B102F1D15; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:42:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1770795760; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=ATDZLB5iIVAZfKZ0JOgmFSZxjgAKCzxQXahRUCaMZ2k=; b=0mxrcduVJWeUcV0xXKoi5cMDETpu/78TAutg1fUriUAAO6mRMKTSSvXawF9nw4XcxsGdce gTh48kw44ubOozgDhoDQwEJD2CvNbzSeyDrdds7xUoAwKB33W6ivK1X2XFqRaTg7aBtAmX mZpSzakBPScLgkG0PizyecjVxhHwNuWl2ECtz2vVajMCiMlfO1t76NWIVTbM26isJsLiX5 k/quGzyqDqcLq0P37wNbNkUfk3UD5XxcT3rtkLOnpUDJJGrTKkjVqbcgLvo3Th2pTeBSVp J7dHSY+FPQTuqwrQPTWRaGA+XJbczj0COlSJU1g8iEOLgw2/tSsNVnueavVXsQ== Message-ID: <3369b59c-a56e-4c5a-9da0-0d3becfa69d6@bootlin.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:42:31 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Christophe Leroy , Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=B6ry_Maincent?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Beh=C3=BAn?= , Oleksij Rempel , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2_Veronese?= , Simon Horman , mwojtas@chromium.org, Romain Gantois , Daniel Golle , Dimitri Fedrau References: <20260205092317.755906-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20260210201101.5df36a41@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Maxime Chevallier In-Reply-To: <20260210201101.5df36a41@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Jakub On 11/02/2026 05:11, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:23:03 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote: >> Here's V5 of the second phy_port series, this time bringing support for >> more phy_port use especially for SFP, as well as the begining of a >> ethnl uAPI. >> >> V5 doesn't contain a lot of changes, only a doc formatting fix as well >> as a fix for a potentially un-initialized pointer. > > Any idea why this is set to Changes Requested in PW? :S > The 3rd patch carries a Fixes tag, makes me want to apply the first > 3 changes for 7.0.. I guess it's because of AI review ? The first 3 patches can be applied together indeed, it makes logical sense. Thank you, Maxime