From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=7Uv1=PJ=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C45C43387
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  1 Jan 2019 20:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341DC2075D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  1 Jan 2019 20:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=memeware.net header.i=@memeware.net header.b="N3X3U92X"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727221AbfAAUFs (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:05:48 -0500
Received: from cock.li ([185.100.85.212]:33030 "EHLO cock.li"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725919AbfAAUFr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:05:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=memeware.net; s=mail;
        t=1546373145; bh=LokOEpJe2Fvt1IEn+V29ptbStlHjUO/CmaMdwb9mi2k=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From;
        b=N3X3U92XAZ73cy4+1v4itxF35QqPpCkIgUVDTLCze/0ogvnjv85hu7i4yvcBs2MQP
         3gM+JuS2MDyhGgMQEK/AB6f2l9Tl4PCBVFNdn1GUtTHEVHXfec9vqXjdlVdoa7Py/R
         foInzrGKyt1m3/ACVmE3xLFrmNdhuAOXYD2cr2W1NHQR08SiTxX7cYnG1AXD7B9cWn
         IBzedLMjvvazgUwnVrkKCLtxfvlJbSsyfzrofqo+XWDJ3uE5T12FwV1WpNhkFGLCFL
         eJZONNA4UfD3fYwgR3MRsJ9iNhvbfFUuFUMvUHBQ5MIcZ53gHzqGpLEAwYHLhVJkPo
         /4z8qoqDMQA1w==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 01 Jan 2019 20:05:44 +0000
From:   vnsndalce@memeware.net
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org,
        legal@lists.fedoraproject.org, users@lists.fedoraproject.org,
        rms@gnu.org
Cc:     gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com,
        misc@openbsd.org
Subject: They claim that your property can be taken from you because to do
 otherwise would be inconvenient to the people that are committed to committing
 the taking.
Message-ID: <3370f7fb2c5ebfeeb6a54b3a48b867be@memeware.net>
X-Sender: vnsndalce@memeware.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Notice the detractors always simply say "NO u can't do this!" or "No u 
can't do this because this belongs to this group!".

While I explain where your rights come from, their history, and their 
extent.

Detractors say "This is like when Author, after being payed millions, 
tries to revoke an exclusive license from Publisher and have existing 
Published Works seized and destroyed!" "AND U CANT DO THAT!"

They try to fit the new case of
'Author was paid nothing, signed over nothing, didn't require anything 
from licensees'
to these cases where good consideration was payed for the license, and 
destruction of physical copies is being sought.

I have explained why this case is different.

For X to have an interest, it is vital that X secured it.

The detractors claim otherwise. They claim that your property can be 
taken from you because to do otherwise would be inconvenient to the 
people that are committed to committing the taking.