From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753261Ab3AUMei (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:34:38 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48171 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015Ab3AUMeh (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:34:37 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: myungjoo.ham@gmail.com Cc: Nishanth Menon , linux-pm , Kevin , lkml , lo , Jack , Alexander Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OPP usage fixes for RCU locking Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3394404.9F6oTTpRKB@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc4; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1358538755-29109-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <2007041.tOt4VKpdOD@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, January 21, 2013 02:45:32 PM MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, January 18, 2013 01:52:31 PM Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Despite being documented in function documentation and in > >> Documentation/power/opp.txt, many of the users of OPP APIs > >> dont honor RCU lock usage appropriately. > >> > >> This recently appeared in IRC discussion earlier today [1]. > >> I did an audit of current usage and the following series > >> is a result of this. > >> > >> NOTE: > >> 1. The patch "PM / devfreq: exynos4_bus: honor RCU lock usage" has only > >> been build tested as I dont have an exynos platform to try it on. I have > >> tried to make it as least intrusive as possible and at least reviewed > >> to ensure I haven't screwed anything up. > >> > >> Other than this, I have added appropriate tested by information in requisite > >> patches. > > > > Thanks for the fixes. > > > > MyungJoo, do you want me to take the devfreq ones too? > > > > Rafael > > Yes, please take RCU-OPP patches. Having those patches splitted > doesn't seem beneficial. OK, I will take them. > I'll let other devfreq patches be based on this after you get them applied. OK Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.