From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tj@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: simplify the percpu kthreads check in update_tasks_cpumask()
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:56:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33c2bf85-6def-fce9-9ea7-3b3e80db67b7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc8202fd-a31c-2b08-bd01-8b5868aab230@redhat.com>
On 2023/7/5 11:14, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/4/23 07:30, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> kthread_is_per_cpu() can be called directly without checking whether
>> PF_KTHREAD is set in task->flags. So remove PF_KTHREAD check to make
>> code more concise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index 58e6f18f01c1..601c40da8e03 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
>> /*
>> * Percpu kthreads in top_cpuset are ignored
>> */
>> - if ((task->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && kthread_is_per_cpu(task))
>> + if (kthread_is_per_cpu(task))
>> continue;
>> cpumask_andnot(new_cpus, possible_mask, cs->subparts_cpus);
>> } else {
>
> The initial intention was to ignore only percpu kthreads. The current code likely ignore all the kthreads. Removing the PF_KTHREAD flag, however, may introduce unexpected regression at this point. I would like to hold off for now until more investigation are done.
IMHO, the current code will ignore only percpu kthreads:
1.If PF_KTHREAD is set in task->flags, this patch doesn't make any difference.
2.If PF_KTHREAD is not set in task->flags, kthread_is_per_cpu will *always return false*. So this patch doesn't make any functional change.
bool kthread_is_per_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct kthread *kthread = __to_kthread(p);
if (!kthread)
return false;
....
}
static inline struct kthread *__to_kthread(struct task_struct *p)
{
void *kthread = p->worker_private;
if (kthread && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PF_KTHREAD is not set, so kthread = NULL.
kthread = NULL;
return kthread;
}
Or am I miss something? Thanks for comment and review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-04 11:30 Miaohe Lin
2023-07-05 3:14 ` Waiman Long
2023-07-05 5:56 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2023-07-05 14:49 ` Waiman Long
2023-07-10 20:25 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33c2bf85-6def-fce9-9ea7-3b3e80db67b7@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®