From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kvm: Handle async page faults directly through do_page_fault()
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 01:28:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34082A11-321D-4DF0-A076-7BBF332DCA66@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53626d08de5df34eacce80cb74f19a06fdc690c6.1582998497.git.luto@kernel.org>
> On Feb 29, 2020, at 9:50 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> KVM overloads #PF to indicate two types of not-actually-page-fault
> events. Right now, the KVM guest code intercepts them by modifying
> the IDT and hooking the #PF vector. This makes the already fragile
> fault code even harder to understand, and it also pollutes call
> traces with async_page_fault and do_async_page_fault for normal page
> faults.
>
> Clean it up by moving the logic into do_page_fault() using a static
> branch. This gets rid of the platform trap_init override mechanism
> completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Indeed the async-PF mechanism is only used by KVM, and there is no need for
over-engineering the solution just in case some other hypervisor ever
introduces support for a similar paravirtual feature.
Yet, this might be a slippery slope, making Linux optimized to run on KVM
(and maybe Xen). In other words, I wonder whether a similar change was
acceptable for a paravirtual feature that is only supported by a proprietary
hypervisor, such as Hyper-V or VMware.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-29 17:50 Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-02 9:28 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2020-03-02 10:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34082A11-321D-4DF0-A076-7BBF332DCA66@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®