mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: puneet_kaushik@persistent.co.in
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Needed faster implementation of do_gettimeofday()
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:28:17 +0530 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34373.203.199.147.2.1108897097.squirrel@webmail.persistent.co.in> (raw)

Hello all,

I am running oprofile on some program. Following is the oprofile output.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not
stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 100000
samples  %        app name                 symbol name
985913    8.6083  vmlinux                  mark_offset_tsc
584473    5.1032  libc-2.3.2.so            getc
295901    2.5836  vmlinux                  ide_outb
270823    2.3646  vmlinux                  _spin_lock
249791    2.1810  vmlinux                  _spin_unlock
236140    2.0618  vmlinux                  timer_interrupt
175249    1.5302  ld-2.3.2.so              do_lookup_versioned
140429    1.2261  sendmail                 putc
138739    1.2114  sendmail                 stabhash
134145    1.1713  sendmail                 getc

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


>From this output what I can analyse is that mark_offset_tsc(which is
called from do_gettimeofday), and some other timer functions, are taking
most of the CPU.

Is there any faster implementation of do_gettimeofday. I am using kernel
2.6.10. with dual P4.

What I found from google search is: http://lwn.net/Articles/9266/ , which
is only for kernel 2.4

Thanks for help.


-Puneet




             reply	other threads:[~2005-02-20 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-20 10:58 puneet_kaushik [this message]
2005-02-20 15:48 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-22  3:06   ` George Anzinger
2005-02-22 13:56     ` Puneet Kaushik
2005-02-22 15:46       ` Chris Friesen
2005-02-22 16:44       ` George Anzinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34373.203.199.147.2.1108897097.squirrel@webmail.persistent.co.in \
    --to=puneet_kaushik@persistent.co.in \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®