mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: BlueZ development <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	ML netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: use wait_event API instead of open-coding it
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 19:58:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <343B67B0-5FE7-4113-8725-202AC0C8BA8A@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419152937.13515-1-john@metanate.com>

Hi John,

> I've seen timeout errors from HCI commands where it looks like
> schedule_timeout() has returned immediately; additional logging for the
> error case gives:
> 
> 	req_status=1 req_result=0 remaining=10000 jiffies
> 
> so the device is still in state HCI_REQ_PEND and the value returned by
> schedule_timeout() is the same as the original timeout (HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT
> on a system with HZ=1000).
> 
> Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of open-coding similar
> behaviour which is subject to the spurious failure described above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
> ---
> I saw problems with the -rt patchset on 4.9 and I'm not convinced that
> it's Bluetooth at fault for the problem described above, but I think
> this is a nice cleanup even if it's not a bug fix.
> 
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 30 +++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel

      reply	other threads:[~2018-04-23 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-19 15:29 John Keeping
2018-04-23 17:58 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=343B67B0-5FE7-4113-8725-202AC0C8BA8A@holtmann.org \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@metanate.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®