From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D671FC433F5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238806AbiEJJdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 05:33:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57132 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238807AbiEJJdF (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 05:33:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A659328C9E7 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 02:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id o12-20020a1c4d0c000000b00393fbe2973dso997468wmh.2 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 02:29:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MhAYVo3FRVrEBjsLxRmNmYz+wA6niYBVjv7CpLws+mY=; b=zeosEfdIXYcHNN1pUgI0BkmmJUttXywUhQjl7fXULUKNuUouAvYQoPtuoq7EYbvALE XuAbOdjiHiZcIA7jAfecgU9jZaLSoB05wXsDeXsEv5z6oDfF6sm/y4WBNZuKb1Mx56xY iF+1UW2bPZTc7t5oeTKDpUEEhxNLbx3MHRhAMG81FVy49lBzpoC+gaUFySD33UuVNUrT ufS7ux0KoydITb83dE+inItKdL245fppr6pea6kBU2tM/XuyDsm+eVZYU1HmdZMpeXwL yxcSRANphL8eD/gC6AKGhSZbHDdZYJLgGwO39UH0uDl/9S8J4V5rsuh2pKnXX5N8AW3p qR5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MhAYVo3FRVrEBjsLxRmNmYz+wA6niYBVjv7CpLws+mY=; b=o8Ylw07NmrunjywZPvPsesB8yjtK4C3k+bwr/VTpuJoBaGPA602QQZMIVyUyQdo5L2 cfq2K7eBHrDgqRMRKrqbsz+WQezibG+9p6NhDFLyu7DDaQ55sRG5UsjutjPVE+662Dn9 q12iJovICsh6mbaT7KHRZ++J69Yp3sl8DV3lOVSp4rawG0yxgIupS8sNNEmDxV1gUxVF UTfgfTdLwVzU3glIxPV37zxFpFfJYJR6KZboqgXe7YaNQkFm7+MQ2KEJwEZy9WhIeVxp 2tDuQXQfhblNRN+9J303UrWt0sPXMDYCs3WQhtyidtJ+sHFrf2HVqd4+OrMLyZGAKSq3 HcLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/8+mOlreEfyp+yuIv2z98PbBEROL4VmQmpVCuiWFxEFpEq8FO nKSt2JezOJ/dqsyasq6HqitsE6HFDF3S5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwT1rfkvN0EwBtxD2mn2lu+ol6JEg8B6h9VMuHE5iXU9GQroxX6Ttz8RRnjZ8IKjRHcKADqFg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4fd4:b0:394:8e96:6d21 with SMTP id o20-20020a05600c4fd400b003948e966d21mr10429150wmq.60.1652174946056; Tue, 10 May 2022 02:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.86.34] (cpc90716-aztw32-2-0-cust825.18-1.cable.virginm.net. [86.26.103.58]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ay5-20020a05600c1e0500b003942a244ec8sm2055885wmb.13.2022.05.10.02.29.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 May 2022 02:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <344a9a7f-a858-6d83-9cd8-ee97a2bd6a74@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:29:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] nvmem: patches (set 1) for 5.19 Content-Language: en-US To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220429162701.2222-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> From: Srinivas Kandagatla In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/05/2022 14:47, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 05:26:45PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> Here are some nvmem patches for 5.19 which includes >> >> - new nvmem provider for Apple efuses. >> - support for regmap and TA 2.1 devices in sfp provider >> - add device tree node support in nvmem cell info >> - brcm_nvram provider to parse cells from dt. >> - few minor clean ups in qfprom, bcm-ocotp and sunplus-ocotp >> >> Can you please queue them up for 5.19. > > Not all of these applied cleanly. Can you please rebase and resend the > remaining ones? Sure, looks like there is only one patch("nvmem: brcm_nvram: check for allocation failure") that needs to be resent and I confirmed that all the other patches are already applied. will resend that one. --srini > > thanks, > > greg k-h