Re: [PATCH net] driver core: auxiliary bus: Fix sysfs creation on bind

[Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>]

On 23/10/2025 9:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 09:19:27AM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> From: Amir Tzin <amirtz@nvidia.com>
>>
>> In case an auxiliary device with IRQs directory is unbinded, the
>> directory is released, but auxdev->sysfs.irq_dir_exists remains true.
>> This leads to a failure recreating the directory on bind [1].
>>
>> Using the attributes group visibility interface, expose the IRQs
>> attributes group if"f the xarray storing IRQs entries is not empty. Now
>> irq_dir_exists field is redundant and can be removed.
>>
>> [1]
>> [] mlx5_core.sf mlx5_core.sf.2: mlx5_irq_affinity_request:167:(pid 1939):
>>     Failed to create sysfs entry for irq 56, ret = -2
>> [] mlx5_core.sf mlx5_core.sf.2: mlx5_eq_table_create:1195:(pid 1939):
>>     Failed to create async EQs
>> [] mlx5_core.sf mlx5_core.sf.2: mlx5_load:1362:(pid 1939):
>>     Failed to create EQs
>>
>> Fixes: a808878308a8 ("driver core: auxiliary bus: show auxiliary device IRQs")
>> Signed-off-by: Amir Tzin <amirtz@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/auxiliary.c       |  13 +++-
>>   drivers/base/auxiliary_sysfs.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   include/linux/auxiliary_bus.h  |  26 ++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
>> index 04bdbff4dbe5..b0fb31279257 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
>> @@ -225,7 +225,16 @@ static int auxiliary_bus_probe(struct device *dev)
>>   		return ret;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	return auxdrv->probe(auxdev, auxiliary_match_id(auxdrv->id_table, auxdev));
>> +	ret = auxiliary_bus_irq_dir_res_probe(auxdev);
>> +	if  (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> Please always use scripts/checkpatch.pl so that you don't get grumpy
> maintainers asking you why you didn't use scripts/checkpatch.pl...
> 

Sure. Always running it before submissions.
It passes for me. Anything I miss?


total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 258 lines checked
patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.