From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D6B3386F0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758054340; cv=none; b=ZclajHAluxu6oObjMteksfTRlpMGgUeVgKRniTWoW+sL3CjUapA7HJJov5jmoHKhx6RFWD34IAHagRXTHG9N0lhRmQayQzbPydNE5fjtdRL0K1Wn8BsoLjV15PuDPRkqgr9B5NoRfnLWXPC/ROVmHHG221uhGS0QKLIEAsUixDw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758054340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VrrA3GHnJGk6gH4rg+SR+QXFsrBpgZZ6IRWvVmtTOOU=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=hXm3IfCaTif1AIhFa3PEmnqX3vOZag7SgcA8f3d67Qc3rx48504+FhGYUH+PLZ5rOQhI45EUhxHGnZNCMkzPWSPbPyFHJolaM1attTD6zI3vZU99nGLJfk7cSbKwqS1/8vwANyGS9u38M6GMMhiz7nf7gx9m+23l06kFmkVY8+4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b=jxhD2jXX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b="jxhD2jXX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surriel.com ; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References: In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VrrA3GHnJGk6gH4rg+SR+QXFsrBpgZZ6IRWvVmtTOOU=; b=jxhD2jXXthqh0ICJCAQC2ecIWW CRzXt+3lfIOoJSTkHddIwPxFqJ1csHBaxaqlnQfMUwy5YZF9pWS+qlIB6cSAdLHq7clHjQpcGsu+H kCZnCLAhTNVAqeBYJxtCujTsHjOblc3OaB9n2NoiAWjg9pYp61ScdQMwxtDbNOwQC4YPokegSAqWN QZVkvQRIkUBLWtE7n6XdxFIv+Y6uIYdelQpQAQV94m2skQVkvrOAbbXBI+pJy7f06HEkgbNjsxGIQ aP4XmlVg+vbuBvonpcQ16OMsP58U7m9KgI2ATQfBHGjRSw5zWozFmGnZgoGRuxAOasY0UGgBCiXuN W1nj1oZg==; Received: from fangorn.home.surriel.com ([10.0.13.7]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1uycEu-000000008Rw-1ZY4; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:25:24 -0400 Message-ID: <34637892ccb9b4e4247103a7b141300c90cf2e42.camel@surriel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] mm/cma: clean up flag handling a bit From: Rik van Riel To: Frank van der Linden , akpm@linux-foundation.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, david@redhat.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:25:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20250915195153.462039-3-fvdl@google.com> References: <20250915195153.462039-1-fvdl@google.com> <20250915195153.462039-3-fvdl@google.com> Autocrypt: addr=riel@surriel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mQENBFIt3aUBCADCK0LicyCYyMa0E1lodCDUBf6G+6C5UXKG1jEYwQu49cc/gUBTTk33A eo2hjn4JinVaPF3zfZprnKMEGGv4dHvEOCPWiNhlz5RtqH3SKJllq2dpeMS9RqbMvDA36rlJIIo47 Z/nl6IA8MDhSqyqdnTY8z7LnQHqq16jAqwo7Ll9qALXz4yG1ZdSCmo80VPetBZZPw7WMjo+1hByv/ lvdFnLfiQ52tayuuC1r9x2qZ/SYWd2M4p/f5CLmvG9UcnkbYFsKWz8bwOBWKg1PQcaYHLx06sHGdY dIDaeVvkIfMFwAprSo5EFU+aes2VB2ZjugOTbkkW2aPSWTRsBhPHhV6dABEBAAG0HlJpayB2YW4gU mllbCA8cmllbEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokBHwQwAQIACQUCW5LcVgIdIAAKCRDOed6ShMTeg05SB/986o gEgdq4byrtaBQKFg5LWfd8e+h+QzLOg/T8mSS3dJzFXe5JBOfvYg7Bj47xXi9I5sM+I9Lu9+1XVb/ r2rGJrU1DwA09TnmyFtK76bgMF0sBEh1ECILYNQTEIemzNFwOWLZZlEhZFRJsZyX+mtEp/WQIygHV WjwuP69VJw+fPQvLOGn4j8W9QXuvhha7u1QJ7mYx4dLGHrZlHdwDsqpvWsW+3rsIqs1BBe5/Itz9o 6y9gLNtQzwmSDioV8KhF85VmYInslhv5tUtMEppfdTLyX4SUKh8ftNIVmH9mXyRCZclSoa6IMd635 Jq1Pj2/Lp64tOzSvN5Y9zaiCc5FucXtB9SaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAc3VycmllbC5jb20+iQE +BBMBAgAoBQJSLd2lAhsjBQkSzAMABgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDOed6ShMTe g4PpB/0ZivKYFt0LaB22ssWUrBoeNWCP1NY/lkq2QbPhR3agLB7ZXI97PF2z/5QD9Fuy/FD/jddPx KRTvFCtHcEzTOcFjBmf52uqgt3U40H9GM++0IM0yHusd9EzlaWsbp09vsAV2DwdqS69x9RPbvE/Ne fO5subhocH76okcF/aQiQ+oj2j6LJZGBJBVigOHg+4zyzdDgKM+jp0bvDI51KQ4XfxV593OhvkS3z 3FPx0CE7l62WhWrieHyBblqvkTYgJ6dq4bsYpqxxGJOkQ47WpEUx6onH+rImWmPJbSYGhwBzTo0Mm G1Nb1qGPG+mTrSmJjDRxrwf1zjmYqQreWVSFEt26tBpSaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAZmIuY29tP okBPgQTAQIAKAUCW5LbiAIbIwUJEswDAAYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQznneko TE3oOUEQgAsrGxjTC1bGtZyuvyQPcXclap11Ogib6rQywGYu6/Mnkbd6hbyY3wpdyQii/cas2S44N cQj8HkGv91JLVE24/Wt0gITPCH3rLVJJDGQxprHTVDs1t1RAbsbp0XTksZPCNWDGYIBo2aHDwErhI omYQ0Xluo1WBtH/UmHgirHvclsou1Ks9jyTxiPyUKRfae7GNOFiX99+ZlB27P3t8CjtSO831Ij0Ip QrfooZ21YVlUKw0Wy6Ll8EyefyrEYSh8KTm8dQj4O7xxvdg865TLeLpho5PwDRF+/mR3qi8CdGbkE c4pYZQO8UDXUN4S+pe0aTeTqlYw8rRHWF9TnvtpcNzZw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 19:51 +0000, Frank van der Linden wrote: > Atomic bit operations aren't needed for the cma flags > field, so switch their manipulation over to normal > AND/OR operations. >=20 > Also export the bit values in linux/cma.h, as we will > be adding publicly used values later. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden >=20 Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel --=20 All Rights Reversed.