From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933281AbaCQNJL (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:09:11 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:51583 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933001AbaCQNJJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:09:09 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Paul Bolle Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: v3.14-rc1+: new error: "nsc-ircc, Wrong chip version ff" Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:24:36 +0100 Message-ID: <3479041.IcXy3De7AH@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.14.0-rc6+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1395059613.1999.7.camel@x41> References: <1395006095.2002.8.camel@x41> <3120107.Slm5jUkmCN@vostro.rjw.lan> <1395059613.1999.7.camel@x41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, March 17, 2014 01:33:33 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki schreef op ma 17-03-2014 om 01:02 [+0100]: > > On Sunday, March 16, 2014 10:41:35 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > > > 2) What should I do to make that error go away? > > > > This is not an error, but a message whose log level is too high. It basically > > means "I found something, but I don't like it, so I'm not going to handle it." > > I see. It's actually quite old and is mentioned rather often on the web. > I must have seen if before, when I actually used IrDA, but that's a few > years ago now. I see. > > The messages come from nsc_ircc_setup(), which is called from nsc_ircc_open(), > > which in turn is called by nsc_ircc_init(), which is a module intialization > > function of the nsc-ircc module. > > > > I *guess* what happens is that the PNP layer creates a PNP device object > > for something it didn't create an object for previously, so I wonder if the > > patch below makes those messages go away? > > No, they're still there (with this patch applied on top of v3.14-rc7). Beats me then. I'm sure it can be tracked down, but I'm not sure it's worth spending the time. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.