mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:10:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34829993-a888-4f7c-a2c6-e87723644c3c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030161011.282924-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

On 10/30/25 17:10, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> 
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
> 
> system_wq should be the per-cpu workqueue, yet in this name nothing makes
> that clear, so replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq.
> 
> The old wq (system_wq) will be kept for a few release cycles.

Oh, good point!

> 
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 8c4d79f6c14f..2f8160702f9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -4798,7 +4798,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  		}
>  		/* must succeed. */
>  		amdgpu_ras_resume(adev);
> -		queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
> +		queue_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
>  				   msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));
>  	}
>  
> @@ -5328,7 +5328,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_resume(struct drm_device *dev, bool notify_clients)
>  	if (r)
>  		goto exit;
>  
> -	queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
> +	queue_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
>  			   msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));

In this particular use case we actually don't want the percpu wq.

This can execute on any CPU except for the current one.

Regards,
Christian.

>  exit:
>  	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-30 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-30 16:10 [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 17:14   ` Christian König
2025-10-31  8:42     ` Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31  8:44       ` Christian König
2025-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 17:10   ` Christian König [this message]
2025-10-31  9:01     ` Marco Crivellari
2025-11-03 15:07       ` Christian König
2025-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] amd/amdkfd: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 17:15   ` Christian König
2025-10-31  8:48     ` Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31 13:12       ` Philip Yang
2025-11-03 15:01         ` Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/radeon: " Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34829993-a888-4f7c-a2c6-e87723644c3c@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®