From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751364AbcKYIS5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 03:18:57 -0500 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbcKYISs (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 03:18:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 To: "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dedekind1@gmail.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at, wd@denx.de, sbabic@denx.de, dengler@linutronix.de, ebiggers@google.com, mhalcrow@google.com, hch@infradead.org References: <1479072072-6844-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20161114030548.eils5al7ugfhlqwg@thunk.org> From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <34885683-a40f-eaff-b99d-b11fc68803f7@nod.at> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:18:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161114030548.eils5al7ugfhlqwg@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ted, On 14.11.2016 04:05, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Richard, > > Your fscrypt patches look good. I've created an fscrypt branch on the > ext4.git tree which contains your changes as well as Eric Bigger's > recent fspatch cleanups changes. If you want to base your ubifs > changes on that branch, that would be great. The ext4 dev branch will > be including that fscrypt branch, so it will be feeding into > linux-next that way. If you also base your patches on that, it will > avoid duplicate patches in linux-next and in Linus's tree when he > pulls them. Do you want us to address Eric's review comments on top of the fscrypt branch or shall we rebase? I'd suggest the former. Thanks, //richard