mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com" <vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:53:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <349be75346aaf03eda8c49dfd90c06e3f916a1e3.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <360a492f-58b0-daa4-a450-3cdbfffbeabe@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 22:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 19/11/2018 12:29, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
> > from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
> > by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
> > 
> > Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
> > CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
> > 
> > Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
> > counters.
> > 
> > This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
> > That's what we used to have:
> > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > 
> >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > 
> >          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
> >                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
> >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
> >                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
> >            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
> >            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> >             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
> >              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
> > 
> >        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> >        0.000000000 seconds user
> >        0.010000000 seconds sys
> > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > 
> > And now we'll see:
> > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > 
> >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > 
> >           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
> >                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
> >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
> >                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
> >            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
> >            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> >             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
> >              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
> > 
> >        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> >        0.003519000 seconds user
> >        0.000000000 seconds sys
> > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > 
> > Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
> > execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're runnign
> > @ 1GHz here).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Maybe a bit too late but I completely forgot to add stable tag into Cc list.
Any chance to add it still?

-Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-19 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-19 11:29 Alexey Brodkin
2018-11-19 12:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19 17:33 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-11-19 21:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19 21:53   ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2018-11-19 22:09     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19 22:10       ` Alexey Brodkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=349be75346aaf03eda8c49dfd90c06e3f916a1e3.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®