From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: airlied@gmail.com, dakr@redhat.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@intel.com,
javierm@redhat.com, kherbst@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lyude@redhat.com,
mripard@kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/nvif: Avoid build error due to potential integer overflows
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 18:54:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34a6d812-b4ed-4465-b0ec-e641d185b9b1@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240518143743.313872-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
(adding linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org)
Le 18/05/2024 à 16:37, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
> Trying to build parisc:allmodconfig with gcc 12.x or later results
> in the following build error.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c: In function 'nvif_object_mthd':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c:161:9: error:
> 'memcpy' accessing 4294967264 or more bytes at offsets 0 and 32 overlaps 6442450881 bytes at offset -2147483617 [-Werror=restrict]
> 161 | memcpy(data, args->mthd.data, size);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c: In function 'nvif_object_ctor':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c:298:17: error:
> 'memcpy' accessing 4294967240 or more bytes at offsets 0 and 56 overlaps 6442450833 bytes at offset -2147483593 [-Werror=restrict]
> 298 | memcpy(data, args->new.data, size);
>
> gcc assumes that 'sizeof(*args) + size' can overflow, which would result
> in the problem.
>
> The problem is not new, only it is now no longer a warning but an error since W=1
> has been enabled for the drm subsystem and since Werror is enabled for test builds.
>
> Rearrange arithmetic and add extra size checks to avoid the overflow.
>
> Fixes: a61ddb4393ad ("drm: enable (most) W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem")
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> checkpatch complains about the line length in the description and the (pre-existing)
> assignlemts in if conditions, but I did not want to split lines in the description
> or rearrange the code further.
>
> I don't know why I only see the problem with parisc builds (at least so far).
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c
> index 4d1aaee8fe15..baf623a48874 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/object.c
> @@ -145,8 +145,9 @@ nvif_object_mthd(struct nvif_object *object, u32 mthd, void *data, u32 size)
> u8 stack[128];
> int ret;
>
> - if (sizeof(*args) + size > sizeof(stack)) {
> - if (!(args = kmalloc(sizeof(*args) + size, GFP_KERNEL)))
> + if (size > sizeof(stack) - sizeof(*args)) {
> + if (size > INT_MAX ||
> + !(args = kmalloc(sizeof(*args) + size, GFP_KERNEL)))
Hi,
Would it be cleaner or better to use size_add(sizeof(*args), size)?
> return -ENOMEM;
> } else {
> args = (void *)stack;
> @@ -276,7 +277,8 @@ nvif_object_ctor(struct nvif_object *parent, const char *name, u32 handle,
> object->map.size = 0;
>
> if (parent) {
> - if (!(args = kmalloc(sizeof(*args) + size, GFP_KERNEL))) {
> + if (size > INT_MAX ||
> + !(args = kmalloc(sizeof(*args) + size, GFP_KERNEL))) {
Same.
CJ
> nvif_object_dtor(object);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-18 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 14:37 Guenter Roeck
2024-05-18 16:54 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2024-05-18 17:32 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-18 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-19 1:19 ` Joe Perches
2024-05-19 14:09 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34a6d812-b4ed-4465-b0ec-e641d185b9b1@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®