Re: [PATCH v2] nfc: st95hf: switch to using sleeping variants of gpiod API

[Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>]

On 7/25/26 01:00, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The driver does not use gpiod API calls in an atomic context. Switch
> to gpiod_set_value_cansleep() calls to allow using the driver with GPIO
> controllers that might need process context to operate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

> ---
> 
> v2: - dropped extra "not" from commit description (Przemek Kitszel)
>      - link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9b77e25c-8942-42f7-b82e-42b492b437d8@intel.com
> 
> FTR I am not using this driver but I'm helping clean up legacy gpio APIs
> and stumbled on this. Using "cansleep" where we can is simply a good
> practice.
> 
>   drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
> index 321fbe8aeca8..4d772a308bff 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
> @@ -450,19 +450,19 @@ static int st95hf_select_protocol(struct st95hf_context *stcontext, int type)
>   static void st95hf_send_st95enable_negativepulse(struct st95hf_context *st95con)
>   {
>   	/* First make irq_in pin high */
> -	gpiod_set_value(st95con->enable_gpiod, HIGH);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(st95con->enable_gpiod, HIGH);
>   
>   	/* wait for 1 milisecond */
>   	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>   
>   	/* Make irq_in pin low */
> -	gpiod_set_value(st95con->enable_gpiod, LOW);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(st95con->enable_gpiod, LOW);
>   
>   	/* wait for minimum interrupt pulse to make st95 active */
>   	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>   
>   	/* At end make it high */
> -	gpiod_set_value(st95con->enable_gpiod, HIGH);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(st95con->enable_gpiod, HIGH);
>   }
>   
>   /*