mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: docs/driver-api/conventions resolve conflicts btw CFMWS, LMH, ED
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:54:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34fcdfb0-e32c-4eb3-8afe-49c34dcab2c3@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618151710.1001847-1-fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

On 6/18/25 8:17 AM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Add documentation on how to resolve conflicts between CXL Fixed Memory
> Windows, Platform Memory Holes, and Endpoint Decoders.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/cxl/conventions.rst | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/conventions.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/conventions.rst
> index da347a81a237..acf2523ae799 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/conventions.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/conventions.rst
> @@ -45,3 +45,88 @@ Detailed Description of the Change
>  ----------------------------------
>  
>  <Propose spec language that corrects the conflict.>
> +
> +
> +Resolve conflict between CFMWS, Plaftform Memory Holes, and Endpoint Decoders
> +=============================================================================
> +
> +Document
> +--------
> +
> +CXL Revision 3.2, Version 1.0
> +
> +License
> +-------
> +
> +SPDX-License Identifier: CC-BY-4.0
> +
> +Creator/Contributors
> +--------------------
> +
> +Fabio M. De Francesco, Intel
> +Dan J. Williams, Intel
> +Mahesh Natu, Intel
> +
> +Summary of the Change
> +---------------------
> +
> +According to the current CXL Specifications (Revision 3.2, Version 1.0)
> +the CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure (CFMWS) describes zero or more Host
> +Physical Address (HPA) windows that are associated with each CXL Host
> +Bridge. Each window represents a contiguous HPA range that may be
> +interleaved across one or more targets, some of which are CXL Host Bridges.
> +Associated with each window are a set of restrictions that govern its

                               is

> +usage. It is the OSPM’s responsibility to utilize each window for the
> +specified use.
> +
> +Table 9-22 states the Window Size field contains that the total number of

                                           contains the total number of

> +consecutive bytes of HPA this window represents and this value shall be a
> +multiple of Number of Interleave Ways * 256 MB.
> +
> +Platform Firmware (BIOS) might reserve part of physical addresses below
> +4 GB (e.g., the Low Memory Hole that describes PCIe memory space for MMIO
> +or a requirement for the greater than 8 way interleave CXL regions starting
> +at address 0). In that case the Window Size value cannot be anymore
> +constrained to the NIW * 256 MB above-mentioned rule.
> +
> +On those systems, BIOS publishes CFMWS which communicate the active System
> +Physical Address (SPA) ranges that map to a subset of the Host Physical
> +Address (HPA) ranges. The SPA range trims out the hole, and capacity in the
> +endpoint is lost with no SPA to map to CXL HPA in that hole.
> +
> +The description of the Window Size field in table 9-22 needs to take that
> +special case into account.
> +
> +Note that the Endpoint Decoders HPA range sizes have to comply with the
> +alignment constraints and so a part of their memory capacity might not be
> +accessible if their size exceeds the matching CFMWS range's.
> +
> +Benefits of the Change
> +----------------------
> +
> +Without this change, the OSPM wouldn't match Endpoint Decoders with CFMWS
> +whose Window Size don't comply with the alignment rules and so all their
> +capacity would be lost. This change allows the OSPM to match Endpoint
> +Decoders whose HPA range size exceeds the matching CFMWS and create
> +regions that at least utilize part of the decoders total memory capacity.
> +
> +References
> +----------
> +
> +Compute Express Link Specification Revision 3.2, Version 1.0
> +<https://www.computeexpresslink.org/>
> +
> +Detailed Description of the Change
> +----------------------------------
> +
> +The current description of a CFMWS Window Size (table 9-22) is replaced
> +with:
> +
> +"The total number of consecutive bytes of HPA this window represents. This
> +value shall be a multiple of NIW*256 MB. On platforms that reserve physical
> +addresses below 4 GB for special use (e.g., the Low Memory Hole for PCIe
> +MMIO on x86), an instance of CFMWS whose Base HPA is 0 might have a window
> +size that doesn't align with the NIW*256 MB constraint; note that the
> +matching Endpoint Decoders HPA range size must still align to the
> +above-mentioned rule and so the memory capacity that might exceeds the

                                                              exceed

> +CFMWS window size will not be accessible.".
> 
> base-commit: a021802c18c4c30dff3db9bd355cacb68521f1aa

-- 
~Randy


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 15:17 Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-06-18 15:54 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2025-06-20 12:46   ` Fabio M. De Francesco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34fcdfb0-e32c-4eb3-8afe-49c34dcab2c3@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®