From: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mux-pca954x: Force reset on probe if available
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 10:06:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <350e9638-1127-c0e5-290b-9d04725c1b8e@topic.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc56d669-b02f-a017-844d-e095bbbcb7cd@axentia.se>
On 08-05-18 08:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-01 13:42, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>> Instead of just hogging the reset GPIO into deactivated state, activate and
>> then de-activate the reset. This allows for better recovery if the CPU was
>> reset halfway through an I2C transaction for example.
>
> I can't see any problems with this, and a reset at load time can certainly
> be a benefit. Some questions below though...
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
>> index 09bafd3..13e10d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
>> @@ -389,10 +390,17 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, muxc);
>> data->client = client;
>>
>> - /* Get the mux out of reset if a reset GPIO is specified. */
>> - gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> + /* Reset the mux if a reset GPIO is specified. */
>> + gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> if (IS_ERR(gpio))
>> return PTR_ERR(gpio);
>> + if (gpio) {
>> + /* Datasheet specifies a 4 ns reset-low time */
>> + udelay(1);
>
> ndelay(4) ?
>
I have several reasons for making it much much longer:
- A true 4ns pulse might not make it through the GPIO controller (on some
chips, the GPIO controller runs at 1/10th of the CPU speed or even less)
- Board designers tend to treat RESET signals as "DC", so a 250MHz pulse might
not make it through. There may be level converters and open-drain drives in
the signal path as well.
- I've only looked it op on a few chips, others may have different values
I think best is to just remove the comment line, it doesn't really help.
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
>> + /* Datasheet specifies a 500 ns reset recovery time */
>> + udelay(1);
>
> ndelay(500) ?
Similar reasons as above.
>
>> + }
>>
>> match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(pca954x_of_match), &client->dev);
>> if (match)
>>
>
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-08 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 11:42 Mike Looijmans
2018-05-08 6:36 ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-08 8:06 ` Mike Looijmans [this message]
2018-05-19 21:58 ` Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=350e9638-1127-c0e5-290b-9d04725c1b8e@topic.nl \
--to=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®