mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:46:06 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3513371.1135791966050.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051228154138.GA18798@elte.hu>

Am Mi 28.12.2005 16:41 schrieb Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:

>
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > But one caveat: turning on unit-at-a-time makes objdump -S / make
> > foo/bar.lst with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO essentially useless because
> > objdump
> > cannot deal with functions being out of order in the object file.
> > This
> > can be a big problem while analyzing oopses - essentially you have
> > to
> > analyze the functions without source level information. And with
> > unit-at-a-time they become bigger so it's more difficult.
> >
> > But I still think it's a good idea.
>
> hm, i dont seem to have problems with DEBUG_INFO. I picked a random
> address within the kernel:
>
> c035766f T schedule_timeout
>
> (gdb) list *0xc035768f
> 0xc035768f is in schedule_timeout (kernel/timer.c:1075).
> 1070 * should never happens anyway). You just have the printk()
> 1071 * that will tell you if something is gone wrong and where.
> 1072 */
> 1073 if (timeout < 0)
> 1074 {
> 1075 printk(KERN_ERR "schedule_timeout: wrong timeout "
> 1076 "value %lx from %p
", timeout,
> 1077 __builtin_return_address(0));
> 1078 current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> 1079 goto out;
> (gdb)
>
> or is it something else that breaks?

It's objdump that breaks. Try objdump -S. gdb can deal with it, but you
can't generate
mixed C/assembly listings with it, so it's hard to match up the exact
lines.

(apparently it's possible through the gdb/mi interface, but I haven't
attempted
that yet)

-Andi




      reply	other threads:[~2005-12-28 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-28 11:47 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 12:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:04     ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 12:50         ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 15:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-28 15:34   ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 15:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 17:46     ` Andreas Kleen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3513371.1135791966050.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®