From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C91F33DF; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 15:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751556755; cv=none; b=SpkYa7daE/Gi7KnXaqXf2Qg857XD7m2VFZRcxY7KBSa7OhXlyPgmr2YyhntkY7JAtcLAXFF7I2inazw/XJORrWxh0w8hRmwCjgHb2z6WYu87KagHCe1SVaZAhfPnyydbwWOeXmSXUxZOPjjbmnC6NpFDL7+KE3t33kpKiyWCQ0k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751556755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DVnQ3R4GAGqrM49yYZnMSfxouS6uvaIV4BLTB6didP0=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=AIFuBtld6e66OifLI115LQggS7wuDQk/a5v2o0ygAq/BBeVIGCgbsuRaCZshqDfLJQpNwUCENG7R9L9UCTQ5PEaev143TSRD+cK3gJi+od2CuUhxWKFPOPi/9twzSCkrab1jNXrruRP1vqRZISKwxRNHnuQqZGhsV0EwVf5Us80= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=TeUJR3Hi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=S8hPrxeF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="TeUJR3Hi"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="S8hPrxeF" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2536BEC019E; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 11:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-02 ([10.202.2.81]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Jul 2025 11:32:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1751556752; x=1751643152; bh=ew8V1Wt0zqQcHxxoIg5sNu57Yffvi4a5WQBGLVx8qhI=; b= TeUJR3HiGddMqqjV77VC9HGBhhaZ3k03dSlU7vhZd3VsPz2D/ehXYK9ligEVLJx5 O3kD/7/KQbd4t0dOsPy0V56aHQcmg2TZ5nb3iKvI9WY368eyLnzQTDDqp9mh1hxE dHCCqWHiASU4A9hab6pDG9cR/CaOWm5aNT+IJPYjeEwpg1KaxoeoFXmtIPvbxYGN xw7fQfs008OMbtJF6izzV1omuM8Whk/Z+cetp7XFw7Pi/6sZRIxkfq9Ts7KgYLkn BuPO8Ae2Fes28kW8Dihcp1uBA3B0Sy+AxjLKxfF5q3HNeyV6OIWeDYjq/RHj92+0 5/GU+zBGjDAzxzdLEIfrYA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1751556752; x= 1751643152; bh=ew8V1Wt0zqQcHxxoIg5sNu57Yffvi4a5WQBGLVx8qhI=; b=S 8hPrxeFaptSKvtsK3AQk0Jx9iOmD4i7WVRJ5Bbvv0Zyn8S83p1SiUUl82b/O6TK8 r1yH6B66q17XGuj2vJX1xq6+IWC1C3vdLKhk3tj9EXUsNSrpDt9azhQgqCqaO13M VqOLv2ROgmvY5Ecr/HdYypsnR54Z2y3SSUneCNsmPbWJ6E92hOdAhxcHGbQk1wie vQ/Jjt+PVKKXZNkcy/mUe1ronZSCmK9F6EEAsi1iomkVT0rMOEIB2oy4k6DrZt+v fBYlST1sWsxbs249cTywKUlXbHktYDpdh/NjjEPfJz25CsscKQnbZ7bJ5JQw/E9G PCi67Fa05R1s0UDh/88dQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgddvtdeigecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefoggffhffvvefkjghfufgtgfesthejredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdetrhhnugcu uegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpefhtdfhvddtfeehudekteeggffghfejgeegteefgffgvedugeduveelvdekhfdvieen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrrhhnug esrghrnhgusgdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeduiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht pdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhejudejsegrnhguvghsthgvtghhrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epthhimheitdelsegrnhguvghsthgvtghhrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphhrrggshhgr khgrrhdrmhgrhhgruggvvhdqlhgrugdrrhhjsegsphdrrhgvnhgvshgrshdrtghomhdprh gtphhtthhopehprghlmhgvrhesuggrsggsvghlthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrohhu segvvggtshdrsggvrhhkvghlvgihrdgvughupdhrtghpthhtoheprghlvgigsehghhhith hirdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhnohhrodgutheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtoheptghonhhorheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhriihkodguth eskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2ECB2700065; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 11:32:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: Te44b159e2532e323 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:32:08 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Conor Dooley" , "Ben Zong-You Xie" Cc: "Paul Walmsley" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Albert Ou" , "Alexandre Ghiti" , "Rob Herring" , krzk+dt@kernel.org, "Conor Dooley" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Daniel Lezcano" , "Lad, Prabhakar" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim609@andestech.com Message-Id: <352681c3-88ca-4122-9ad3-0a0ef33caf7b@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20250611-tapeless-arson-a6ace3c42c00@spud> References: <20250602060747.689824-1-ben717@andestech.com> <20250606-booth-icky-b416c1827a43@spud> <20250609-donut-oozy-4dcc8b8a292d@spud> <20250609-twiddling-clamp-eaa0dd2b1cad@spud> <20250611-tapeless-arson-a6ace3c42c00@spud> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add Voyager board support Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Jun 11, 2025, at 18:21, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 12:13:16AM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:17:50PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Ball is in your court now, after rc1 make a tree and get it in >> > > > > linux-next, and then send a pr to soc@kernel.org with this new content. >> > > > > Perhaps the defconfig should go separately, I can take that one if you >> > > > > want. > >> > > > Thanks for your guidance on these patches. I will send a PR to >> > > > soc@kernel.org as you suggested. >> > > > >> > > > For the defconfig patch, I'm happy for you to handle it. Just let me >> > > > know if there's anything specific you'd like me to include. >> > > >> > > Okay, I picked it up on the basis that you'll send this all to Arnd for >> > > 6.17 >> > >> > Sorry, I think that was really poorly worded. I picked it up on the >> > basis that you're going to send the other patches in the series to Arnd >> > for 6.17. >> >> According to the SoC maintainer documentation [1], I should send a >> patchset (not a PR) to soc@kernel.org. Since I'm not a submaintainer yet. >> I think I should not sent a PR to the main SoC maintainer. Is that right? > > I think you can send a PR and not worry about it. > >> Further, I have two questions about sending a patchset: >> 1. Should I send v5 or start a new patchset? >> 2. Should I continue excluding the defconfig patch, as we discussed >> previously? I think it should be included now. > > Arnd, you okay with a defconfig in the same branch as the dts/core > bindings for a new platform? I'll happily drop it from by branch if it > can all go as one. Sorry I missed your question earlier, I finally got to it now as I am going through the pull requests in patchwork. Having the defconfig, MAINTAINERS and Kconfig updates in the branch for a new platform is fine, in this case it makes sense to keep everything together. I'm also planning to have multiple new SoC targets in 6.17 and would put them into a separate branch that does not contain the dts changes for the existing SoCs. For the pull request that Ben sent, there were a couple of mistakes, I'll reply on that separately. It probably would made more sense to send the patches to soc@lists.linux.dev (note that the soc@kernel.org address got renamed but they still both work) than to send a pull request this time. Arnd