From: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Fwd: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3837105 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1561 __cfsb_csd_unthrottle+0x149/0x160
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 16:59:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3544d5e3-3070-9ddc-fa6c-a05ed35dfd14@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230904222351.GC2568@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2023/9/5 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:48:29PM +0800, Hao Jia wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, rq->clock_update_flags may be set to
>> RQCF_ACT_SKIP after __schedule() holds the rq lock, and sometimes the rq
>> lock may be released briefly in __schedule(), such as newidle_balance(). At
>> this time Other CPUs hold this rq lock, and then calling
>> rq_clock_start_loop_update() may trigger this warning.
>>
>> This warning check might be wrong. We need to add assert_clock_updated() to
>> check that the rq clock has been updated before calling
>> rq_clock_start_loop_update().
>>
>> Maybe some things can be like this?
>
> Urgh, aside from it being white space mangled, I think this is entirely
> going in the wrong direction.
>
> Leaking ACT_SKIP is dodgy as heck.. it's entirely too late to think
> clearly though, I'll have to try again tomorrow.
Hi Peter,
Do you think this fix method is correct? Or should we go back to the
beginning and move update_rq_clock() from unthrottle_cfs_rq()?
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 0:37 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-08-30 0:42 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-08-30 19:16 ` Benjamin Segall
2023-08-31 8:48 ` [External] " Hao Jia
2023-09-04 22:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 8:59 ` Hao Jia [this message]
2023-09-07 21:01 ` Tim Chen
2023-09-08 3:28 ` Hao Jia
2023-10-24 8:52 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/core: Fix RQCF_ACT_SKIP leak tip-bot2 for Hao Jia
2023-11-01 10:53 ` Fwd: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3837105 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1561 __cfsb_csd_unthrottle+0x149/0x160 Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3544d5e3-3070-9ddc-fa6c-a05ed35dfd14@bytedance.com \
--to=jiahao.os@bytedance.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=igor.raits@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®