From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932636AbbCRBNP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:13:15 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49959 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753589AbbCRBNN (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:13:13 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 02:37:06 +0100 Message-ID: <3557241.dRi1Xkn3WC@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.19.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4032246.STUT1iRmIk@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <4032246.STUT1iRmIk@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is > rather costly. Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree? I'll probably have material on top of them. Rafael