From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/aio.c: Cosmetic
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 19:22:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35625559ea6fa7827e840905a4a03e624fdeb43f.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7CCB9FA6-DE85-4E3F-B3F1-7144F01589D4@dilger.ca>
On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 17:50 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Changes:
> > - Consistently use 'unsigned int', instead of 'unsigned'.
> > - Add a blank line after variable declarations.
> > - Move variable declarations to the top of functions.
> > - Add a blank line at the top of functions if there are no declarations.
>
> I'd agree that the other changes are following kernel coding style, but
> I've never heard of leaving a blank line at the start of functions without
> any local variables.
I think that is odd as well.
> I don't see anything in process/coding-style.rst to
> support this change, nor are the majority of variable-less functions
> formatted this way, and it seems to just be a waste of vertical space.
checkpatch emits a --strict CHECK for those blank lines after
open braces
CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
#200: FILE: fs/aio.c:256:
{
+
CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
#246: FILE: fs/aio.c:370:
{
+
etc...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 15:05 [PATCH] " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-02 15:24 ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-02 21:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-03 0:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2020-11-03 3:22 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-11-03 9:50 ` [PATCH v3] " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-20 22:06 ` [PATCH v4] " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-21 1:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-21 11:41 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35625559ea6fa7827e840905a4a03e624fdeb43f.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®