From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752964AbaIZClC (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:41:02 -0400 Received: from cnbjrel01.sonyericsson.com ([219.141.167.165]:11450 "EHLO cnbjrel01.sonyericsson.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386AbaIZClA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:41:00 -0400 From: "Wang, Yalin" To: "'Catalin Marinas'" , Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Will Deacon , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , "'linux-mm@kvack.org'" , "'linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org'" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig=27?= , DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:40:54 +0800 Subject: RE: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned Thread-Topic: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned Thread-Index: Ac/Y15GJS/OdjTIxTdagaUoaJnJjvQAWwnEA Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103D6DB49163B@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> References: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103D6DB49161F@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <20140919095959.GA2295@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140925143142.GF5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140925154403.GL10390@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140925154403.GL10390@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > They were so close ;) > > I can see three patches but none of them exactly right: > > 8157/1 - wrong diff format > 8159/1 - correct format, does not have my ack (you can take this one if > you want) > 8162/1 - got my ack this time but with the wrong diff format again > > Maybe a pull request is a better idea. > I am really confused, I read this web: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php it said use diff -urN to generate patch like this: diff -Nru linux.orig/lib/string.c linux/lib/string.c but I see other developers use git format-patch to generate patch and submit to the patch system. Git format-patch format can also be accepted by the patch system correctly ? If yes, I think this web should update, Use git format-patch to generate patch is more convenient than use diff -urN Thanks