mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>
To: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
Cc: <agross@kernel.org>, <andersson@kernel.org>,
	<konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add Generic RPM(h) PD indexes
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 20:00:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35b6b086-9b03-49df-b80d-863218b42fae@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1688647793-20950-2-git-send-email-quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>

On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 06:19:51PM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add Generic RPM(h) Power Domain indexes that can be used
> for all the Qualcomm SoC henceforth.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
> Suggested-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Does it make sense to give this link [1] so that we know what is
Konrad's suggestion and the discussion around it?

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/0d468d08-6410-e424-b4f3-5245cdb0334a@linaro.org/
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> index 83be996..6498251 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,55 @@
>  #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_QCOM_RPMPD_H
>  #define _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_QCOM_RPMPD_H
>  
> +/* Generic RPMH Power Domain Indexes */
> +#define RPMHPD_CX		0
> +#define RPMHPD_MX		1
> +#define RPMHPD_CX_AO		2
> +#define RPMHPD_MX_AO		3
> +#define RPMHPD_GFX		4
> +#define RPMHPD_MSS		5
> +#define RPMHPD_EBI		6
> +#define RPMHPD_LCX		7
> +#define RPMHPD_LMX		8
> +#define RPMHPD_MMCX		9
> +#define RPMHPD_MMCX_AO		10
> +#define RPMHPD_MXC		11
> +#define RPMHPD_MXC_AO		12
> +#define RPMHPD_NSP		13
> +#define RPMHPD_NSP0		14
> +#define RPMHPD_NSP1		15
> +#define RPMHPD_QPHY		16
> +#define RPMHPD_DDR		17
> +#define RPMHPD_XO		18
> +
> +/* Generic RPM Power Domain Indexes */
> +#define RPMPD_VDDCX		0
> +#define RPMPD_VDDCX_AO		1
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMX		2
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMX_AO		3
> +#define RPMPD_VDDCX_VFL		4
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMX_VFL		5
> +#define RPMPD_VDDCX_VFC		6
> +#define RPMPD_LPI_CX		7
> +#define RPMPD_LPI_MX		8
> +#define RPMPD_SSCCX		9
> +#define RPMPD_SSCCX_VFL		10
> +#define RPMPD_SSCMX		11
> +#define RPMPD_SSCMX_VFL		12
> +#define RPMPD_VDDSSCX		13
> +#define RPMPD_VDDSSCX_VFC	14
> +#define RPMPD_VDDGFX		15
> +#define RPMPD_VDDGFX_VFC	16
> +#define RPMPD_VDDGX		17
> +#define RPMPD_VDDGX_AO		18
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMDCX		19
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMDCX_AO	20
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMDCX_VFC	21
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMD		22
> +#define RPMPD_VDDMD_AO		23
> +#define RPMPD_LPICX_VFL		24
> +#define RPMPD_LPIMX_VFL		25
> +

How did you come up with this list? A union of all SoCs supported by
RPMh driver?

>  /* SA8775P Power Domain Indexes */
>  #define SA8775P_CX	0
>  #define SA8775P_CX_AO	1
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Thanks,
Pavan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-06 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 12:49 [PATCH 0/3] Add support of rpmhpd for SDX75 Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add Generic RPM(h) PD indexes Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 14:30   ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2023-07-06 14:47     ` Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 15:00       ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-06 15:15         ` Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 15:22           ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-06 15:28             ` Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 14:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-06 14:42     ` Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: power: Add compatible for sdx75 Rohit Agarwal
2023-07-06 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add SDX75 power domains Rohit Agarwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35b6b086-9b03-49df-b80d-863218b42fae@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®