mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: RCU indicates stalls with iwlwifi, causing boot failures
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 08:59:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35f03286-eb1-b7a4-8649-a43945223fe4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0f6a6ec-e968-a91c-dc46-357566d8811@google.com>

On Fri, 1 Sep 2023, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2023, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 9/1/23 5:29 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I notice a bug report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> > 
> > Try booting with pcie=noaer ?
> > 
> > That fixes only known iwlwifi bug we have found in 6.5, but we are also using
> > mostly
> > backports iwlwifi driver...
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> > 
> > > 
> > >> I'm seeing RCU warnings in Linus's current tree (like
> > >> 87dfd85c38923acd9517e8df4afc908565df0961) that come from RCU:
> > >>
> > >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:787
> > >> rcu_exp_handler+0x35/0xe0
> > >>
> > >> But they *ONLY* occur on a system with a newer iwlwifi device:
> > >>
> > >> aa:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
> > >> 160MHz (rev 1a)
> > >>
> > >> and never in a VM or on an older device (like an 8260).  During a bisect
> > >> the only seem to occur with the "83" version of the firmware.
> > >>
> > >> iwlwifi 0000:aa:00.0: loaded firmware version 83.e8f84e98.0
> > >> ty-a0-gf-a0-83.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
> > >>
> > >> The first warning gets spit out within a millisecond of the last printk()
> > >> from the iwlwifi driver.  They eventually result in a big spew of RCU
> > >> messages like this:
> > >>
> > >> [   27.124796] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected expedited stalls on
> > >> CPUs/tasks: { 0-...D } 125 jiffies s: 193 root: 0x1/.
> > >> [   27.126466] rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
> > >> [   27.128114] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 0:
> > >> [   27.128122] NMI backtrace for cpu 0 skipped: idling at
> > >> intel_idle+0x5f/0xb0
> > >> [   27.159757] loop30: detected capacity change from 0 to 8
> > >> [   27.204967] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected expedited stalls on
> > >> CPUs/tasks: { 0-...D } 145 jiffies s: 193 root: 0x1/.
> > >> [   27.206353] rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
> > >> [   27.207751] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 0:
> > >> [   27.207825] NMI backtrace for cpu 0 skipped: idling at
> > >> intel_idle+0x5f/0xb0
> > >>
> > >> I usually see them at boot.  In that case, they usually hang the system and
> > >> keep it from booting.  I've also encountered them at reboots and also seen
> > >> them *not* be fatal at boot.  I suspect it has to do with which CPU gets
> > >> wedged.
> > > 
> > > See Bugzilla for the full thread and attached full dmesg output.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217856
> 
> I just took a look at your dmesg in bugzilla: I see lots of page tables
> dumped, including "ESPfix Area", and think you're hitting my screwup: see
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CABXGCsNi8Tiv5zUPNXr6UJw6qV1VdaBEfGqEAMkkXE3QPvZuAQ@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Please give the patch from the end of that thread a try:

Mikhail confirmed it for his case, and Linus already took it into his tree:
ee40d543e97d mm/pagewalk: fix bootstopping regression from extra pte_unmap()

But I couldn't see the WARN_ON_ONCE I was expecting from __rcu_read_unlock()
in your dmesg - ah, but it is only when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled.

Hugh

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-02  0:29 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-02  2:07 ` Ben Greear
2023-09-02  6:59   ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-02 15:59     ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2023-09-05 16:21     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35f03286-eb1-b7a4-8649-a43945223fe4@google.com \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=gregory.greenman@intel.com \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®