mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"open list:USB NETWORKING DRIVERS" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xhci: Set port link to RxDetect if port is not enabled after resume
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:25:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35fbb517-31b1-7bba-8e07-795ab18af1ff@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <635B3350-F064-4B45-B194-40F793423049@canonical.com>

On 22.4.2020 16.21, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2020, at 19:33, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mathias,
>>
>>> On Mar 11, 2020, at 12:04, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dell TB16, Realtek USB ethernet (r8152) connects to an SMSC hub which
>>> then connects to ASMedia xHCI's root hub:
>>>
>>> /:  Bus 04.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/2p, 5000M
>>>   |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/7p, 5000M
>>>           |__ Port 2: Dev 3, If 0, Class=Vendor Specific Class, Driver=r8152, 5000M
>>>
>>> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
>>> Bus 004 Device 002: ID 0424:5537 Standard Microsystems Corp. USB5537B
>>> Bus 004 Device 003: ID 0bda:8153 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8153 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
>>>
>>> The port is disabled after resume:
>>> xhci_hcd 0000:3f:00.0: Get port status 4-1 read: 0x280, return 0x280

That sound like the actual problem.
Any idea how the port link ends up ends up in the disabled state?
Was there a request to set port feature, link state to SS.Disabled? 
Or timeouts at resume from U3
U3 -> Recovery  (timeout) -> Rx.Detect -> Polling (Timeout) ->  SS.Disabled

>>>
>>> According to xHCI 4.19.1.2.1, we should set link to RxDetect to transit
>>> it from disabled state to disconnected state, which allows the port to
>>> be set to U0 and completes the resume process.
>>>
>>> My own test shows port can still resume when it's not enabled, as long
>>> as its link is in U states. So constrain the new logic only when link is
>>> not in any U state.

Sounds more like re-enumerate than proper resume if we go to RxDetect in between

>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>>
>> Do you think this is a proper fix?
> 
> Another gentle ping...
> 
>>
>> Kai-Heng
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> index a9c87eb8951e..263f9a9237a1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> @@ -1776,6 +1776,14 @@ int xhci_bus_resume(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>>> 			clear_bit(port_index, &bus_state->bus_suspended);
>>> 			continue;
>>> 		}
>>> +
>>> +		/* 4.19.1.2.1 */
>>> +		if (!(portsc & PORT_PE) && (portsc & PORT_PLS_MASK) > XDEV_U3) {
>>> +			portsc = xhci_port_state_to_neutral(portsc);
>>> +			portsc &= ~PORT_PLS_MASK;
>>> +			portsc |= PORT_LINK_STROBE | XDEV_RXDETECT;
>>> +		}
>>> + 
This doesn't look like the right solution.
This will set the link state to RxDetect for any USB3 roothub port
that is currently not in U0/U1/U2/U3 or Recovery.

Was this roothub port forcefully suspended xhci_bus_suspend()?
i.e. was a bit set in bus_state->bus_suspended for this port?

Any other logs or traces that could explan what's going on?
Is the resume due to a wakeup (device initiated resume) from this device,
or just a host initiated resume?

Thanks
-Mathias

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11  4:04 Kai-Heng Feng
2020-03-26 11:33 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-22 13:21   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 11:25     ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2020-04-27  9:05       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-27 16:49         ` Mathias Nyman
2020-05-07  4:52           ` Kai-Heng Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35fbb517-31b1-7bba-8e07-795ab18af1ff@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome