From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Rework PREPARE config and hook into a more generic CONVERT
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:56:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36036850-2d73-4c0f-84bc-64ba542ba425@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEvNRgGz_Qm1z+e-7Rh2OZ1bfjVBMEB91-Ki+3Vi3mBf5uMdiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/17/2026 5:42 AM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
>
>> On 7/15/2026 7:10 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Rework guest_memfd's "prepare" hook into a more generic "convert" flow in
>>> anticipation of supporting in-place conversion, at which point KVM will use
>>> the hook for both to-private and to-shared conversions, not just to
>>> "prepare" PRIVATE memory.
>>>
>>> Opportunistically rename kvm_gmem_prepare_folio() to kvm_gmem_make_private()
>>> to better reflect its role.
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static int kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>>> gfn = ALIGN_DOWN(gfn, nr_pages);
>>> index = kvm_gmem_get_index(slot, gfn);
>>>
>>> - return kvm_arch_gmem_prepare(kvm, gfn, folio_file_pfn(folio, index),
>>> - nr_pages, folio_order(folio));
>>> + return kvm_arch_gmem_convert(kvm, gfn, folio_file_pfn(folio, index),
>>> + nr_pages, folio_order(folio), true);
>>> #else
>>> return 0;
>>> #endif
>>> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>>> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - r = kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(kvm, slot, gfn, folio);
>>> + r = kvm_gmem_make_private(kvm, slot, gfn, folio);
>>
>> I think this and above renaming don't make sense, because
>> kvm_gmem_get_pfn() can be invoked for shared memory for non-Coco VMs
>> when KVM_MEMSLOT_GMEM_ONLY is set.
>>
>
> Makes sense.
>
>> Maybe this patch can be moved to gmem in-place series and after [1]?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/3b64e897-93a8-4f9c-88a9-f416ff44b09d@intel.com/
>>
>
> How about doing everything else in this patch in this patch, other than
> this:
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index 173a7ed008d17..9df6927dd8f55 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ static pgoff_t kvm_gmem_get_index(struct
> kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> * On successful return the guest sees a zero page so as to avoid
> * leaking host data and the up-to-date flag is set.
> */
> -static int kvm_gmem_make_private(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> - gfn_t gfn, struct folio *folio)
> +static int kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> + gfn_t gfn, struct folio *folio)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT
> unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> }
>
> - r = kvm_gmem_make_private(kvm, slot, gfn, folio);
> + r = kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(kvm, slot, gfn, folio);
>
> folio_unlock(folio);
>
> I'll move just this renaming to [1] like you suggested.
>
> I think it's okay to continue to always call prepare_folio(), and within
> the prepare_folio() function, only do conversion when the CONVERT CONFIG
> is defined.
I don't think so.
This patch not only renames kvm_arch_gmem_prepare() to
kvm_arch_gmem_convert(), but also adds one more parameter
'bool to_private'
and hardcodes the new parameter to true. This mean the arch callback
will convert the folio to private unconditionally in kvm_prepare_folio()
when CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT is enabled.
Note the CONFIG is not a per-VM thing but a build time thing. The
unconditionally-converting-to-private semantic can also be applied to
gmem-only memslot for non-Coco VMs whenever the
HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT is enabled when building the kernel.
Though the code won't do anything for gmem-only memslot for non-Coco
VMs, the literal semantic of the function and parameter is wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 23:10 [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: guest_memfd: reclaim()/convert() cleanups Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Plumb the number of pages and max order into .invalidate() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:52 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-15 8:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-16 7:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-21 16:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Rename invalidate() arch hook to reclaim() and isolate it Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:53 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-15 8:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-16 10:04 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Drop the redundant printk on arch gmem_prepare() failure Sean Christopherson
2026-07-15 8:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-16 10:05 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Fold __kvm_gmem_prepare_folio() into its sole caller Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:55 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-21 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-22 1:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Explicitly pass number of pages to kvm_arch_gmem_prepare() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] KVM: x86: Combine .gmem_prepare()+.gmem_invalidate() into .gmem_convert() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-15 0:06 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-15 0:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-15 9:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-15 9:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-17 3:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-21 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-21 18:13 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-21 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-14 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Rework PREPARE config and hook into a more generic CONVERT Sean Christopherson
2026-07-15 0:09 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-15 9:53 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-16 9:35 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-16 21:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-17 3:56 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2026-07-21 16:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-22 3:25 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 20:33 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36036850-2d73-4c0f-84bc-64ba542ba425@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®