From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/qib: remove superfluous fallthrough statements
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:01:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36066d75-899e-c9ca-835e-0040659c914b@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <777e01f8dc9bd35e8b7bdf1b5181d0d13b86d8b9.camel@perches.com>
On 8/25/20 11:47, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 11:49 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>> On 8/25/20 11:26, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 11:19 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/20 10:51, Alex Dewar wrote:
>>>>> Commit 36a8f01cd24b ("IB/qib: Add congestion control agent implementation")
>>>>> erroneously marked a couple of switch cases as /* FALLTHROUGH */, which
>>>>> were later converted to fallthrough statements by commit df561f6688fe
>>>>> ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword"). This triggered a Coverity
>>>>> warning about unreachable code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove the fallthrough statements and replace the mass of gotos with
>>>>> simple return statements to make the code terser and less bug-prone.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This should be split up into two separate patches: one to address the
>>>> fallthrough markings, and another one for the gotos.
>>>
>>> I don't think it's necessary to break this into multiple patches.
>>> Logical changes in a single patch are just fine, micro patches
>>> aren't that useful.
>>>
>>
>> There is a reason for this. Read the changelog text and review the patch.
>
> What makes you think I didn't already do that?
>
You would have noticed this should be two patches.
> I think your desire for micropatches is unnecessary.
>
You might be generalizing. My 'desire' here is justified and specific.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 15:51 Alex Dewar
2020-08-25 16:19 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-08-25 16:26 ` Joe Perches
2020-08-25 16:49 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-08-25 16:47 ` Joe Perches
2020-08-25 17:01 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2020-08-25 20:55 ` Joe Perches
2020-08-25 16:58 ` Alex Dewar
2020-08-25 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Alex Dewar
2020-08-25 19:33 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-08-26 19:18 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-08-27 0:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-27 1:41 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-08-27 10:40 ` Alex Dewar
2020-08-31 16:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] IB/qib: tidy up process_cc() Alex Dewar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36066d75-899e-c9ca-835e-0040659c914b@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=alex.dewar90@gmail.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®