From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] READ_ONCE, WRITE_ONCE, kcsan: Perform checks in __*_ONCE variants
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 22:28:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <360AFD09-27EC-4133-A5E3-149B8C0C4232@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2pn60ob.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
> On May 19, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Yes, it's unfortunate, but we have to stop making major concessions just
> because tools are not up to the task.
>
> We've done that way too much in the past and this particular problem
> clearly demonstrates that there are limits.
>
> Making brand new technology depend on sane tools is not asked too
> much. And yes, it's inconvenient, but all of us have to build tools
> every now and then to get our job done. It's not the end of the world.
>
> Building clang is trivial enough and pointing the make to the right
> compiler is not rocket science either.
Yes, it all make sense from that angle. On the other hand, I want to be focus on kernel rather than compilers by using a stable and rocket-solid version. Not mentioned the time lost by compiling and properly manage my own toolchain in an automated environment, using such new version of compilers means that I have to inevitably deal with compiler bugs occasionally. Anyway, it is just some other more bugs I have to deal with, and I don’t have a better solution to offer right now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 18:38 Marco Elver
2020-05-12 19:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-19 21:10 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-19 21:25 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-19 21:45 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-19 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 2:28 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2020-05-20 2:47 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-20 3:16 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-20 3:44 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-20 7:28 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=360AFD09-27EC-4133-A5E3-149B8C0C4232@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®